Everett shuts down Flock camera network after judge rules footage public record
aranaur
115 points
17 comments
March 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 80.4ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Why some cities are shutting down Flock cameras amid privacy concerns devonnull · 15 pts · April 06, 2026 · 62% similar
- Authorities say Flock cameras' data allegedly used for immigration enforcement pseudolus · 78 pts · May 07, 2026 · 56% similar
- Flock cameras keep telling police a man who doesn't have a warrant has a warrant johnbarron · 180 pts · May 01, 2026 · 54% similar
- At least 25 Flock cameras have been destroyed in five states since April 2025 rolph · 421 pts · May 17, 2026 · 53% similar
- Flock Holding Closed Police Conference, Requires Police Consent for Marketing jhonovich · 51 pts · May 04, 2026 · 51% similar
Discussion Highlights (10 comments)
cj
URL is 404'ing. Another article.. > Cameras that automatically capture images of vehicle license plates are being turned off by police in jurisdictions across Washington state, in part after a court ruled the public has a right to access data generated by the technology. https://www.geekwire.com/2025/washington-state-cities-turn-o...
altairprime
The above link 404's for me, but https://www.wltx.com/article/news/nation-world/281-53d8693e-... works.
dzink
The link is broken. Here is a working one. https://www.king5.com/article/news/community/facing-race/was...
fuzzfactor
This appears to be an informative link; https://www.everettpost.com/local-news/everett-temporarily-s...
GiorgioG
Great now let’s follow suit in all 50 states.
SlightlyLeftPad
Does them removing it simply because it’s public record imply that they were up to no good?
1123581321
This is a good article about some of the legal particulars. https://www.heraldnet.com/2026/02/24/snohomish-county-judge-... The defense of the photos not being government business until accessed seems shaky. That the physical camera installations were purposeful intentions to conduct government business in those areas is a reasonable line; this doesn't set precedent for Google's information becoming public records because the police might do a google search, to use an extreme example. The proposed legislative amendment that would exclude Flock footage from public records (which would make this judgment moot) makes sense in the light of red light cameras already being excluded by the same legislators. However, I'd like to see a more incisive law covering both that would compel a reasonable amount of public insight into the footage.
hyperific
According to the article, the Flock cameras are still in place but are "offline". Why does that not convince me?
chkaloon
Awesome. I think I'll put in an open records request for the cameras down the street in my little Wisconsin town. See what happens
N_Lens
"The masses/general populace are the enemy" - once you understand that this is the fundamental belief at the root of the elites behaviour, everything will make sense. Flock cameras and AI surveillance is designed to reign in 'the enemy'.