Even more batteries included with Emacs
signa11
92 points
18 comments
June 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 120.7ms across 10,500 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Some Better Defaults for Emacs fanf2 · 24 pts · April 09, 2026 · 58% similar
- The Emacsification of Software rdslw · 255 pts · May 13, 2026 · 58% similar
- Emacs as a Programmable Workbench signa11 · 13 pts · March 30, 2026 · 57% similar
- The Annoying Usefulness of Emacs [video] susam · 27 pts · May 02, 2026 · 54% similar
- Concerning Emacs (and Jazz) spudlyo · 27 pts · May 28, 2026 · 53% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
tptacek
I have been using Emacs since 1994 (Lucid!) and I still don't understand Dired.
buzzwords
I saw orgmode once and I really loved it. Used Doomed and spacemacs. But dear Lord, does everything break on updates and need fixing. I had to give up as I just don't think it's feasible for me to fix my emacs when I want to get some work done.
gnulinux
My 2 cents (I hope I don't offend anyone, and of course Emacs community is amazing). I've been using Emacs full-time since ~2010 but I must admit it's been more like part-time along with VSCode since ~2024. > This is largely a discoverability problem In my experience it's not a discoverability problem at all . Not even a little bit. My problem with emacs batteries has always been stability between different combinations of packages. I know how to use dired, I know how to install elisp packages, I know how to write emacs lisp myself. The issue with emacs is that it's difficult to create large packages with "batteries" because any additional package added can bork some random, seemingly unrelated package. E.g. back in the day (maybe around ~2020s or a bit before?) I've been using Spacemacs without vim keybinding, and although batteries were included and I was happy, this issue I mentioned above was even bigger. Because I constantly had to deal with installing a package and discovering that it broke some unrelated LSP, programming, or autocomplete package. It gets quite a bit frustrating at some point. Since this LLM madness started, I never really installed anything LLM related to Emacs, and have been using other text editor for LLM related stuff, Emacs for everything else (especially if there is a strong Emacs package, e.g. agda2-mode is incredibly good, almost flawless!) Again, just my humble two cents. Obvious Emacs is amazing, and in many ways it's still my go-to, I just think that the biggest issue for me has always been randomly broken packages. Maybe I'm a terrible elisp programmer, that's possible! But I've been using emacs everyday for decades, so idk...
QwenGlazer9000
All the other comments in this thread talk about emacs instability when that hasn't been the case for me. I'm on doom emacs, update once in a while, and everything mostly just works other than some color scheme weirdness I had to fix. I used to be on neovim, and that ecosystem compared to emacs feels like this image: https://i.imgflip.com/2pg2s7.jpg Some of it is the maintainer shielding us from the breaking changes, but I also think the ecosystem is more slow moving than other editors which helps. The editor is older than most devs after all.
shevy-java
Emacs is a great OS. If you complement it with vim then you may have a working editor as well, provided you know how to exit from vim.
mintflow
Nice write up about Emacs, ruler-mode is a thing I never used before. Recently I finally start to C-X M-x to do text scaling, the typing is hard even as near 2 decades user of Emacs.