Even Microsoft couldn't make Windows 11 work well on 8GB of RAM

GeekyBear 29 points 12 comments July 18, 2026
www.theverge.com · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (7 comments)

cebert

I think this is slightly misleading. Modern OSes intentionally use available RAM for caching and will reclaim it when needed. The issue isn’t that Windows is “using 6.7 GB”, but whether the system is under memory pressure and paging. I’m not convinced the author fully understands that.

WarOnPrivacy

It can depend a bit on the use. I'm watching content (Jellyfin) on a ThinkCentre M75n IoT Thin Client. It's underpowered all around. Athlon Silver 3050e, 4GB DDR4 (3.4 avail & not upgraeable) but it's running Win11 enterprise IoT 24H2. The device would sometimes throttle the CPU for unknown reasons (not thermal, no throttle flags). Universal x86 Tuning Utility completely fixed that. The experience is really good up to 1080p videos. It can choke on 4k but it's a bedroom TV; it's fine. Videos on Firefox are no trouble. I'm quite happy with it.

big85

It's bizarre to see 8GB spoken of as barely sufficient for basic uses. I remember when the baseline was measured in megabytes.

throwawaysjskdk

Try using docker, then you’re really in trouble.

vivzkestrel

- stop making bloated stuff

GeertB

I remember that EMACS meant Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping, a reference to the Emacs editor requiring a system with 8 MB of memory and then still swapping. It was considered an exaggeration. Even Windows 95 could run OK-ish on a system with 4 MB of memory, with 8 MB being plenty. We have gained some things in the meantime, and lost some too.

cute_boi

Microslop should stop adding slop like candy crush and 1990 fossil, react native just for the shake of backward compatibility.

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
14,015 stories · 131,331 chunks indexed