Emitting metadata early makes building/checking Rust up to twice as fast
knuckleheads
136 points
32 comments
October 04, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 93.5ms across 8,480 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- How to speed up the Rust compiler in September 2026 trickypr · 242 pts · October 01, 2026 · 57% similar
- Scaling Memory Safety: AI-Assisted Rewrites of C/C++ Dependencies to Rust afdbcreid · 15 pts · August 24, 2026 · 51% similar
- Scaling Memory Safety: AI-Assisted Rewrites of C/C++ Dependencies to Rust ndesaulniers · 12 pts · September 28, 2026 · 51% similar
- Malicious Rust crate Arrayref runs a build-time payload abhisek · 446 pts · August 20, 2026 · 50% similar
- Making My Rust Program Space-Flight Ready hruvhwe · 15 pts · July 15, 2026 · 50% similar
Discussion Highlights (8 comments)
swiftcoder
Excited to see if there is a path to getting this in the mainline compiler
rouanvde
Those are big improvements!
IshKebab
Seems like an easy win! I'm kind of surprised nobody did this already. I guess someone will need to reimplement this by hand given Rust's AI policy, but this is still great because it demonstrates that it's a really good idea.
hmokiguess
So this is like a cache? Reminded me of https://turborepo.dev for TS, is it a similar concept?
tristenharr
Woah nice thought! :) good idea
WalterGR
There’s an interesting comment thread (including potential downsides) about this technique in the submission for “How to speed up the Rust compiler in September 2026” from a couple days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49923594
scoopr
Huh, I kinda thought something like this was already being done, but perhaps it was a bit later stage. Neat! A kind of related shower thought I had, could rustc not instantiate generic methods, but write out what it expects to find (std::Vec<String>::push), and a separate build process listens to these, but makes sure already built ones are not built multiple times from the whole build. I don’t actually know how much of duplication there usually is, but I had gotten the impression that it would be part of the problem. Of course I’m no compiler engineer, and I’m sure there are complications like per crate build profiles, etc.
quotemstr
As an aside, it's just silly to make the repository a bunch of checked-in patches. Git already does revision control. You don't need to do revision control in your revision control.