ECJ says EU states must change gender of citizens even if nat'l laws forbid it
slater
11 points
4 comments
March 13, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 52.4ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Migrating to the EU exitnode · 854 pts · March 23, 2026 · 44% similar
- Critics say EU risks ceding control of its tech laws under U.S. pressure nickslaughter02 · 220 pts · April 03, 2026 · 43% similar
- Europe takes first step to banning AI-generated child sexual abuse images 01-_- · 23 pts · March 15, 2026 · 43% similar
- EU Inc.: A new harmonised corporate legal regime guidoiaquinti · 117 pts · March 18, 2026 · 42% similar
- Chat Control: How Governments and Tech Lobby Try to Overturn EU Parliament vrganj · 35 pts · March 25, 2026 · 41% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
exolymph
Are countries within the EU sovereign, or is the EU sovereign? This is a sincere question. I googled for the official answer, which is that member countries are sovereign, but in terms of realpolitik?
spwa4
I wouldn't worry about this. EU nations have been ignoring the ECJ decisions left right and center. Including decisions about core treaties. Free movement of persons? Not on French borders. Correct taxation? Not in the Netherlands. Rights of children in Youth Services? Not in Denmark, thank you very much. Fair spreading of immigrants? Is there a single EU country respecting that treaty? Maximum occupancy standards in prisons? Same. You see, an ECJ "victory" does not give any non-theoretical rights to the victors. You cannot demand the decision be executed. You cannot demand damages if the court goes your way and the country refuses to implement the decision. One might ask "then what's the point of laws in the EU?". You could ask that about a lot of EU systems ... This isn't like the US supreme court.