Devastated father says his 9-year-old son spent $118,000 on YouTube ads
vanburen
58 points
75 comments
September 16, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 71.3ms across 6,833 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- YouTuber Davie504 slapped with ridiculous copyright claim [video] Panoramix · 45 pts · August 14, 2026 · 42% similar
- Bill Gates' daughter's startup accused of 'cookie stuffing' scheme apparent · 11 pts · August 12, 2026 · 40% similar
- Meta Failed to Catch Hundreds of AI Child Abuse Ads thm · 40 pts · September 08, 2026 · 40% similar
- I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots nickabe · 427 pts · September 11, 2026 · 40% similar
- FTC alleges Amazon illegally made $20B by rigging billions of ad auctions kurthr · 43 pts · September 01, 2026 · 40% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
theandrewbailey
This is one reason why I don't save my payment method for anything. No saved payment method means one less way for surprise charges.
joshstrange
The craziest part of this story, for me, is it was on the dad’s _company_ credit card. Which might not be as surprising except the reason it was already on file is because the dad used his company’s (not _his_ company, the company he works for as an employee) credit card to buy Roblox for his son previously. Is this common? I’ve had access to company credit cards before on a one-off basis (never in my name). Do people legitimately make this mistake? “oops, I put it on the company cards”?
kristopolous
This can be a fairly pure case study on the convergence rate of youtube ads.
lo_fye
Do not let that kid (or his dad) anywhere near an OpenClaw instance.
hacker_homie
They should have to ask for the ccv every double in billing average.
zwischenzug
Didn't the card have a limit?
nkrisc
There are so many things wrong with this story before you even get to the headline. From the information in the article, I can’t really blame Google for this one. This was a series of deliberate blunders on the part of the father. The first blunder was letting a 9 year old have a YouTube account. Putting aside whether a 9 year old should be making videos, the father should have been the one with the account and managing the channel.
amelius
Well, at least he has the YouTube ads.
zug_zug
I blame youtube. I feel like any online service provider has a duty to verify your identity on transactions over $10k USD by default and that should be enshrined in law. Honestly maybe lower.
Ekaros
I feel something is horribly wrong with these ad-companies if there is no contact and automatic approval for spending over 100k on ads... From seemingly small and unknown entity. I would expect some verification or contact, but maybe I just don't understand how world operates...
ModernMech
When I was 9, long ago in the dial-up age, I dialed into a long distance number within our area code and we got a $100 charge for my using Active Worlds. Suddenly, I don't feel so bad about that anymore.
tapper
$118000 and just 37k subs. A shit retern!
spicyusername
Should the father have been more involved to prevent this kind of thing? Sure. Should tech companies make this kind of thing this easy? No. Everyone in here defending our corporate overlords has had the Overton window moved so far on them that they've lost perspective on how companies should be expected to be part of the social contract. We should be building a world that makes it easy for people to do the right thing. Not penalizing them for accidentally doing the wrong thing because nothing matters anymore but the shareholders. Youtube is a fact of life for modern parenting, and it has absolutely atrocious parental controls. As we all know, these companies are filled with people who are perfectly capable of building systems that function to make the world better and easier for everyday people like the father in this story. And yet somehow we're defending the fact that they're doing the exact opposite...
hilbert42
This is really terrible, I feel deeply for the father's predicament. This ought to be a salient lesson: never store card details online despite the convenience. Further, as I do, use only a debit card for online purchases with the available credit only marginally more that for one's immediate purchase. It's also an excellent policy in case of being hacked. Companies that allow employees to use cards with essentially unfettered credit have to take a large amount of the blame in circumstances such as this. There's no reason other than bad policy or irregular monitoring of expenses to allow expenses of this magnitude to build up. The company's financial policies need drastic overhaul.
reacharavindh
I feel like there is a bizarro world I’m not privy to…. I cannot relate to this story as a Dad of a 7 year old.. 1. Dad setting his son up on YouTube with his own channel at 9! 2. Proceeding to tell him about the creepy world of ads and targeting. 3. Creating an ad campaign for the kid! 4. Putting that charge on a company card! 5. Saving the card in an online account! Probably means the kid was using the Dad’s account? 6. When things go south, even saying the words “matter has been escalated and he does not yet know whether he will get to keep his job or have to repay the costs.” as if it is all the universe’s or someone else’s fault… or such a common mishap that it is worthy of just waived away. As judgemental as it sounds… I feel sad for the outcome, but even more sad if this is the normal in our society of today :-(
4ndrewl
"after the (9-year old) boy complained about views"...what a time to be alive.
ofrzeta
Is there not something like fraud detection for an unusual amount of spending, like 40k per week?
daft_pink
Pretty crazy. We use Ramp at work and it allows you to specifically set budgets for every single credit card and get approvals, etc. This should be an advertisement for them. Hope they setup a go fund me as I would be happy to contribute $20 towards paying the $'s back.
burnt-resistor
Would've been much cheaper to buy subscribers and views from a Russian-style vending machine.
mid-kid
It looks like it paid off, since the screenshot in the article, the channel has more than doubled in subscribers (now 70k), and it seems to still be climbing.