Delve removed from Y Combinator
carabiner
182 points
93 comments
April 04, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 50.5ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Delve removed from YC portfolio website cyrusradfar · 31 pts · April 04, 2026 · 90% similar
- Delve allegedly forked an open-source tool and sold it as its own nickvec · 277 pts · April 02, 2026 · 71% similar
- Delve (YC W24) – Fake Compliance as a Service – Part I sebmellen · 39 pts · March 19, 2026 · 61% similar
- Delve – Fake Compliance as a Service – Part II spk_ · 32 pts · March 28, 2026 · 51% similar
- Delve – Fake Compliance as a Service dsr12 · 26 pts · March 20, 2026 · 49% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
gnabgib
Related: Delve allegedly forked an open-source tool and sold it as its own (295 points, yesterday, 153 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615434
jaredsohn
Interestingly, they show up in the company list. When you click the link it returns 404. https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/?query=delve
philip1209
Can they keep their CISO out of jail?
cyrusradfar
Related from an hour earlier: Delve removed from YC website [archive.org] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634405
carabiner
Bye-bye tweet from founder: https://x.com/kocalars/status/2040262537166618887 Notably YC hasn't wished them a farewell.
rvz
There is no saving Delve after this. The only next product launch is an investigation.
bilalq
While I do think Delve and the leadership there should be held responsible, it's a bit weird to see YC and others take shots at them for breaking the law when so many of their prized unicorns achieved what they did by being willing to just ignore laws and deal with the consequences later.
thoughthadlogin
Sure, most companies could add an About section and probably put this behind them pretty quickly. They could have even hired someone like Delve to assure this kind of thing wouldn’t happen again. But Delve themselves can’t really do any of that. They’ve screwed up on a fundamental piece of their own business model. Their core offering *is* Compliance as a Service! How could I trust their word that they’ll ensure my company is compliant? How could I trust their word that a company I’m doing business with is compliant? They can’t even handle their own Apache 2.0 licensed works, and that’s child’s play- relatively speaking. I’m supposed to trust that they can handle PCI and HIPPA and all the rest for other companies? This is like having a dentist who doesn’t brush and floss their own teeth. Or a building inspector working out of a moldy office suite with exposed rebar. Or an editor with a personal website full of typos and grammatical errors. It’s a dealbreaker to anyone with common sense.
baggy_trough
can't believe I almost spent 10 grand on this company a week before they blew up.
jacquesm
"By combining the evidence I collected together with what the sim.ai team provided, I will show that Delve has stolen an open-source company’s tech by violating their license and then making a lot of money with it." -> You mean like OpenAI, Anthropic and all these other 'unicorns'? I'm happy we're all clear on how bad Delve is but in essence what they were doing is exactly the same as what these AI companies do.
maxbond
I'm getting the impression that a lot of people in this thread think this is because they violated an open-source license and saying things to the effect of, "they're just the ones who got caught". I also thought that was the scandal initially. (And when it comes to license violations, yes, there's absolutely more where that came from.) But that's just the cherry on top. I don't think they're being thrown out because they violated a license. There are really serious fraud allegations. Allegedly they were rubber-stamping noncompliant customers, leaving them exposed to potential criminal liability under regulations like HIPPA. https://deepdelver.substack.com/p/delve-fake-compliance-as-a... I've only skimmed this so I do not endorse these allegations, but I think it's context missing from this discussion.
sandeepkd
Its quite ironical and interesting at the same time, seems like there is a threshold size/impact beyond which everyone would come and save you, anything less and you will have to bear the consequences.
wenbin
Curious - in this situation, does delve return money to YC? Or YC simply writes off the investment
everfrustrated
Someone leaked an internal Bookface chat from Garry Tan (YC CEO) saying: We have asked Delve to leave YC. YC is a community, not just an accelerator. The founders in our community have to trust each other, and we have to trust them. When that trust breaks down, there's really only one thing to do. We're not going to get into the details publicly. We wish them well. https://x.com/___4o____/status/2040271468874076380 I have no direct knowledge of the accuracy of any of this. This is not my account.
blast
friday news dump tho
mememememememo
404s for me
hbbio
This other profile is still up: https://www.forbes.com/profile/delve/ 30U30 never ceases to amaze.
nfw2
It's not just about delve. It's about yc's model. YC encourages YC companies to trust other YC companies even though they are early. If you can't trust your batch mates for something as crucial as compliance, the model doesn't work.
phplovesong
Classic. I knew this would happen ever sine i first saw Delve on YC. I was right to trust my gut, and never used their product.
jmcgough
Turns out you can't "fake it til you make it" with SOC2 compliance.