DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
theanonymousone
72 points
21 comments
October 19, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 120.1ms across 9,867 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash-1017 theykk · 790 pts · October 17, 2026 · 87% similar
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek v4.1 Flash 1017 theanonymousone · 513 pts · October 17, 2026 · 86% similar
- DeepSeek-v4.1-Exp nil1511 · 20 pts · September 10, 2026 · 85% similar
- DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Liwink · 959 pts · September 10, 2026 · 84% similar
- DeepSeek 4.1 Flash thatxliner · 12 pts · September 11, 2026 · 82% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
Imustaskforhelp
Really wild that Deepseek's model is 536+16B (passive+active) parameter model and its really comparable to Mimo v2.6 Pro which is the current open source SOTA model which is at (978+42) This is half the size of Mimo and comes pretty damn close to it and I feel like lots of tasks can be done by it. I really like its speed as well but its quite verbose from the benchmarks, IMO, this should be tackled in the near future as well. I wonder if specific fine-tuning can happen just to make the model token-efficient. Also, slightly offtopic though deekseep has good tps but Nvidia's nemotron recent 120B model also has some really crazy tps. I wonder if we are gonna see some really good tps on general hardware. The best part is that the amount of current innovation happening within the space means that a lot of good ideas are bound to be absorbed by one or the other and we will get many of these improvements handed to us :-D I think that such engineering is also the engineering of the trade-offs and on what axis to play on. You can be SOTA but with very low speed, extreme price and other factors. I think its interesting to see how each engineering lab approaches these trade-offs and what they pick. But whatever they pick, its best because its more choices for us to pick upon from (especially if its open weights)
Tiberium
Somehow GPT 6.1 Sol (medium) is cheaper per task ($0.21 vs $0.26) and faster per task (2.9 vs 4.9 minutes) vs v4.1 Flash 1017 (max). I hope AA adds other reasoning effort results of Deepseek so it'd be more realistic to compare it with other models, because IMO using models at max effort is very unrealistic for most people, they then take a huge amount of time and tokens for a small performance uplift.
aliljet
What I really want to know for models like this is if I can have them run on really lame consumer hardware (consider 128gb of ram, 2080ti) with extremely low TPS, but with reasonable enough intelligence that you can walk away and expect something to bake really nicely while you sleep. Perhaps I'm losing touch with the edge, but it doesn't seem like this is quite possible with the hardware baseline I'm talking about...
twelvechairs
Mimo 2.6 pro scores 46 and is half the price (though a lot less throughput). Im not sure why nobody has made the same fuss around it