DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report [pdf]
tianyicui
19 points
4 comments
April 24, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 110.3ms across 10,324 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- DeepSeek v4 impact_sy · 455 pts · April 24, 2026 · 84% similar
- DeepSeek V4: The Open-Source Model Frontier Labs Feared HelloAi · 61 pts · May 15, 2026 · 76% similar
- Notes on DeepSeek vinhnx · 169 pts · June 10, 2026 · 75% similar
- DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence cmrdporcupine · 146 pts · April 24, 2026 · 73% similar
- DeepSeek makes the V4 Pro price discount permanent Tiberium · 351 pts · May 22, 2026 · 70% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
nthypes
Insane! Price is amazing with Opus 4.6 frontier level.
daemonologist
$1.47/M input, $3.48/M output, open weights (MIT license), and competitive with the frontier on their selected benchmarks. Big if it holds up on real-world tasks.
creamyhorror
Two key quotes: • Reasoning: Through the expansion of reasoning tokens, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max demonstrates superior performance relative to GPT-5.2 and Gemini-3.0-Pro on standard reasoning benchmarks. Nevertheless, its performance falls marginally short of GPT-5.4 and Gemini3.1-Pro, suggesting a developmental trajectory that trails state-of-the-art frontier models by approximately 3 to 6 months. Furthermore, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max achieves comparable performance to GPT-5.2 and Gemini-3.0-Pro, establishing itself as a highly cost-effective architecture for complex reasoning tasks. • Agent: On public benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is on par with leading open-source models, such as Kimi-K2.6 and GLM-5.1, but slightly worse than frontier closed models. In our internal evaluation, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max outperforms Claude Sonnet 4.5 and approaches the level of Opus 4.5. While they're some months behind closed SOTA (though benchmarks put them close), I wonder if Deepseek 4's longer context capabilities and kv-cache advantage will make up for this