DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
explosion-s
848 points
332 comments
August 12, 2026
https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v4-pro
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 44.2ms across 4,128 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 quietly released HiPHInch · 79 pts · August 12, 2026 · 82% similar
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 Publish dares2573 · 61 pts · August 12, 2026 · 80% similar
- DeepSeek-v4-flash-vision-exp dares2573 · 473 pts · August 21, 2026 · 70% similar
- DeepSeek v4 Price Increase lukax · 11 pts · August 13, 2026 · 70% similar
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp Is Now Live on the DeepSeek API Platform rochansinha · 17 pts · August 21, 2026 · 66% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
aabdi
https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing/ Competitive with opus 4.8 but weaker than sol or fable. About 20x cheaper.
indigodaddy
@dang - Pls merge this with https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49274018
LeonKnst
I find it interesting how much adoption seems to be influenced by momentum. Some of these Chinese models are surprisingly capable, but developers often default to the models that are already established as the “industry standard
scrlk
Benchmarks: | Benchmark | DS-V4-Pro | DS-V4-Flash | DS-V4-Pro | DS-V4-Flash | GLM-5.2 | Kimi-K3 | Opus-4.8 | Fable 5 | | | 0813 | 0731 | Preview | Preview | | | | (w/ fallback) | |--------------------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|---------------| | HLE (wo/w tools) | 42.7/60.0 | 37.8/51.5 | 37.7/48.2 | 34.8/45.1 | 40.5/54.7 | 43.5/56.0 | 49.8/57.9 | 53.3/63.0 | | Terminal Bench 2.1 | 87.9 | 82.7 | 72.1 | 61.8 | 81.0 | 88.3 | 85.0 | 88.0 | | NL2Repo | 61.5 | 54.2 | 38.5 | 39.4 | 48.9 | - | 69.7 | - | | Cybergym | 83.3 | 76.7 | 52.7 | 38.7 | - | 80.0 | 78.3 | 83.1 | | DeepSWE | 62.7 | 54.4 | 12.8 | 7.3 | 46.2 | 67.5 | 58.0 | 70.0 | | Toolathlon-Verified | 74.1 | 70.3 | 55.9 | 49.7 | 59.9 | 76.5 | 76.2 | 77.9 | | Agents' Last Exam | 25.7 | 25.2 | 16.5 | 15.8 | 23.8 | 27.6 | 25.7 | - | | AutomationBench (Public) | 31.8 | 25.1 | 12.8 | 10.8 | 12.9 | 30.8 | 27.2 | 29.1 | | DSBench-FullStack | 71.1 | 68.7 | 41.8 | 37.0 | 61.8 | 73.7 | 71.6 | 77.2 | | DSBench-Hard | 67.2 | 59.6 | 31.1 | 25.8 | 54.5 | 63.0 | 71.7 | 68.3 | Source: https://reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vmi0fg/deepseek_v4...
Gecko4072
Currently burning money quickly on official deepseek api. They are also increasing pricing starting today. V4 Flash 0731 still feels like the most outstanding model of the past few months and probably to come.
book_mike
What I care about is whether the model is capable of the tasks I give it at the lowest cost. Right now I'm using Kimi-K3/GLM-5.2/Minimax. Sonnet is great but I burn through the tokens too fast. Opus 5 set to max is amazing and more intelligent than all of us. .998 of the time I don't need that kind of intelligence. I just need the job done.
Readerium
V4 Pro has vision correct?
alecsm
I've been using the last Deepseek Flash update for a week and I'm amazed. It was a capable model for easy tasks but now it looks like it can do some heavy development for peanuts. I can't wait to try this new one.
yipinwong
Worse than Luna but more expensive than Luna. Sticking with Luna without sending my data to Deepseek (China)
nthypes
Still behind Kimi-K3 in almost half of the benchmarks
jklmnopqrstuvw
Tested both DS v4 pro 0813 and Grok 4.6 (all from openrouter) on Codex cli. Worked on a same new feature development on my project. Deepseek 4 pro: Worked for 12m 02s - cost $0.12 - has bug. Grok 4.6: Worked for 3m 18s - cost $ 1.41 - no bug.
eshack94
It appears that the only available endpoint (as of this writing) requires enabling "Allow paid endpoints that train on request data" in the OpenRouter privacy settings. I hope additional paid providers will become available that don't require training on data.
nullbyte
Even though cost-per-token is low, Deepseek v4 tends to burn an immense number of tokens to accomplish tasks.
freakynit
Just tested through openrouter.. gave exactly same task.. the task was to scan existing repo, and generate a single docker-compose file to deploy behind a caddy server, where certain port ranges are already used, the service demands widlcard certificates to be provisioned from outside, and postgre needs to be built-in one... Tested this model, and gpt-5.6-terra-high. Results: this one had few issues. terra: none. These results are consistent with my past observations with the latest flash version as well. What benchmarks say, vs what I've been observing are different. They are good till the project is simple... not anymore.
cjg007
Before DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813's price goes up, I expect a surge of frantic traffic — hope the servers can hold up.
simonw
Nice bicycle chain, the little basket with a fish didn't show up in the right place: https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer#url=ht...
Myzura
This model is not very good at coding, but it is quite good at research, evaluation and action, I don't write code, but it really goes head-to-head with the most expensive models in searches such as stock market and forex
nimsarajay
I'm Satisfied with this model (in opencode)
Palmik
Why does this link to OpenRouter, which has no useful information on its own? Linking to the official API or the benchmarks would make more sense: - https://api-docs.deepseek.com/ - https://x.com/ChrisGPT/status/2087572834650407024/photo/1 (officially posted on WeChat, this is just one of many reposts)
XCSme
Again, I will wait until there's a provider that doesn't train on prompts before I will benchmark.