Councilmember, residents push back on AI 'blight scores' given to homes
hn_acker
21 points
3 comments
September 29, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 87.9ms across 8,041 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Most Americans say "not in my backyard" to AI data centers toomuchtodo · 134 pts · July 22, 2026 · 55% similar
- Mayor Mamdani Says Landlords Can't Use AI Images to Advertise gnabgib · 387 pts · July 18, 2026 · 54% similar
- Garbage Trucks Now Have AI Cameras to Score Your House and Clock Code Violations madihaa · 20 pts · September 15, 2026 · 54% similar
- Protesters haul a guillotine to city council meeting about an AI data center cocacola1 · 16 pts · August 20, 2026 · 50% similar
- A 600-acre AI data center could cost some Wisconsin residents their land 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 12 pts · July 20, 2026 · 50% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
hn_acker
The full title is: > Councilmember, residents push back on AI ‘blight scores' given to thousands of homes
ares623
I consider myself a fairly creative individual. I come up with clever ways to solve problems at work, for example, and I take some pride in it. But I can't imagine the level of creativity and cruelty to come up with this idea and follow through with it. Knowing someone came up with the idea of putting surveillance cameras on garbage trucks to negatively rate houses with the potential impact on punishing the residents/owners of said houses, there's no words. That someone, most probably an engineer like me or in a similar space, that I could find myself shaking hands with at a conference, could come up with ways to maximize suffering for others, is hard to reconcile. It reminds me of the story of the man who created the Brazen Bull. The king who commissioned it was so horrified with the device that he ordered the creator to be its first victim.
supertrope
A private bureaucracy compiling data into a consumer dossier. The dossier is then used to judge you. The Fair Credit Reporting Act ought to be applied to this.