Cores in space: The core memory module from a 1980 Spacelab computer
pwg
97 points
16 comments
August 30, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 68.9ms across 4,990 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Mag Computer: A Mag History of RAM (1960–2025) evakhoury · 14 pts · July 24, 2026 · 56% similar
- You Probably Forget How Cheap Memory Used to Be jonbaer · 21 pts · August 26, 2026 · 49% similar
- Processing in Memory: DRAM Is About to Do Math bhouston · 12 pts · August 26, 2026 · 48% similar
- Z80 – The 1970s Microprocessor Still Alive (2021) asdefghyk · 132 pts · August 22, 2026 · 47% similar
- Xcena and Samsung's Near Memory Compute CXL Device klelatti · 56 pts · August 30, 2026 · 45% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
kens
Author here for all your core memory questions...
annoyingnoob
Built by highly skilled humans.
TacticalCoder
Funny to see that frontpage as earlier on today I made a comment saying that with LLMs I'm betting we'll see N-modular redundancy systems soon, with a ultra-hardened, minimal, part picking the majority votes of N LLM-written implementations (in different languages, on different stacks, all running at the same time). Not 100% TFA but "computing in space" involved a lot of N-modular redundancy systems. The reason I'm 99.9% sure we'll see that is that it'll help catch both bugs in the LLMs implementations themselves (and we know there are plenty of those) but also in the stacks/platforms/VMs running those software. Imagine one spec and five implementations (Rust, Go, Java, Python, whatever) and one minimal system, with the tiniest of the tiniest attack surface, returning the answer as soon as 3-of-5 agree. And, as a bonus, if later on one the two "missing" answer arrives and doesn't match, it's cause for enquiry and bugs be smashed. Basically (and although I don't care about Ethereum or cryptocurrencies except for the cryptographic aspect), we already witnessed that: 3 different implementations of Ethereum and, in the early days, one of the implementation whose result differed from the two others. And hence the implementation not respecting the spec (in that case it was the only one that was faulty) got instantly detected (and promptly patched). My memory is fuzzy but I know this happened. Heck, I may write a proof-of-concept for fun. I've got other ideas as to what will be possible in the future but I'm keeping them for another day.
galvanust
I saw this in person and then again on Dr Stone
lampcord
Amazing how reliable core memory was for critical systems, even in space. Bet it weighed a ton compared to modern RAM.
imnotr0b0t
The architecture without inhibit lines is interesting. Did this make the memory faster, or was the main goal simply to reduce the number of sense amplifiers and simplify the board layout?