Copy-fail-destroyer: K8s remediation for CVE-2026-31431
evenh
17 points
13 comments
April 30, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 84.4ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- CVE-2026-31431: Copy Fail vs. rootless containers averi · 59 pts · May 05, 2026 · 65% similar
- Copy Fail, Dirty Frag, and Fragnesia kernel vulnerabilities akhuettel · 120 pts · May 19, 2026 · 58% similar
- Copyfail2 sickthecat · 14 pts · May 07, 2026 · 58% similar
- Podman rootless containers and the Copy Fail exploit ggpsv · 122 pts · May 08, 2026 · 55% similar
- How Cloudflare responded to the “Copy Fail” Linux vulnerability mobeigi · 92 pts · May 07, 2026 · 55% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
cassianoleal
Yeah run a highly privileged, node-level workload by an Internet stranger to mitigate against a kernel vulnerability. No thanks. In any case, this unloads the module which does nothing if it's compiled into the kernel as in GKE.
antiloper
Blacklisting a kernel module only prevents modprobe from loading it automatically. modprobe by name still works, even if the module is blacklisted, and so does insmod and the syscalls they use. The author is way above their head and thinks that because they can write Copilot prompts they can write security critical software.
__turbobrew__
Just use chef or whatever configuration management system of choice.
parliament32
The k8s remediation is setting allowPrivilegeEscalation to false, which you should have already been doing if you follow the in-tree Pod Security Standards at the Restricted profile.