Copy Fail

unsnap_biceps 794 points 311 comments April 29, 2026
copy.fail · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (20 comments)

not_your_vase

Is there a readable version of the exploit readily available by any chance? Gotta admit that I failed binary-zip-interpretation-with-naked-eye class twice

Lorin

What is the rationale behind naming CVEs and individual domains? Marketing?

baggy_trough

Is this fixed in any stable release kernel yet?

skilled

This looks like an extraordinary find at first glance. Does this mean you can go from a basic web shell from a shared hosting account to root? I can see how that could wreak havoc really quickly.

corvad

If this is verified, this is a very big deal. Root access on any shared computer. Additionally do we know what kernel versions and stable versions have the patch?

Ekaros

So this could be usable in lot of places with Python and Linux running? Not that I have too many Linux devices around. Still, might be handy sometimes on personal devices.

porridgeraisin

Better explanation of the write up (still from original exploit author) : https://xint.io/blog/copy-fail-linux-distributions

embedding-shape

For mitigation, the page currently basically just says: > Update your distribution's kernel package to one that includes mainline commit a664bf3d603d But it isn't very clear to me what Kernel version you can expect that to be in. For Arch/CachyOS, the patch seems to be included in 6.18.22+, 6.19.12+ and 7.0+. If you're on any of the lower versions in the same upstream stable series, you're likely vulnerable right now. Some distro kernels may include the fix in other versions, so check for your distribution.

TehCorwiz

It does not behave as described on EndeavorOS (arch-based) running kernel 6.19.14-arch1-1. I receive the error: Password: su: Authentication token manipulation error I'm guessing this means it's already patched?

w2seraph

holy smokes it just rooted my just installed from ISO Ubuntu server

rany_

Could this be used to root Android devices? Does Android ship with algif_aead?

jzb

This is amazing. Page says it works on RHEL 14.3, which doesn’t exist. Current RHEL is 10.x, this must’ve been done in a TARDIS.

themafia

> If your kernel was built between 2017 and the patch This is why I compile my own kernel. I disable things I don't use. If it's not present it can't hurt you. > block AF_ALG socket creation via seccomp regardless of patch state. Likewise I use seccomp to only allow syscalls that are necessary. Everything else is disabled. In the programs I have that need to connect to a backend socket, that is done, and then socket creation is disabled.

maxtaco

Use extreme caution running arbitrary code on your machines, especially obfuscated code that tickles kernel bugs! (edited)

charcircuit

SUID binaries once again assisted a local privilege escalation attack. This is a major problem that distros can't keep ignoring.

bblb

What is "RHEL 14.3"? Was this site a one shot prompt. Quality.

DetroitThrow

Despite the copy/images being weird about RHEL 14.3, this seems to work. Wow?

layer8

Debian page: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-31431

dgellow

That’s the most AI-written page ever made

phreack

The page itself seems vibecoded and a bit of an advertisement, but it does look like the vulnerability is real and high risk. It does explain the big security update I just got, guess I'll prioritize updating today.

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
8,303 stories · 78,303 chunks indexed