Composer 2.5
meetpateltech
18 points
3 comments
May 18, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 90.5ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Composer 2 meetpateltech · 77 pts · March 19, 2026 · 93% similar
- Cursor Introduces Composer 2.5 asar · 93 pts · May 18, 2026 · 83% similar
- Composition shouldn't be this hard larelli · 118 pts · April 24, 2026 · 51% similar
- Cursor Composer 2 is just Kimi K2.5 with RL mirzap · 260 pts · March 20, 2026 · 49% similar
- Cursor 3 adamfeldman · 356 pts · April 02, 2026 · 47% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
hitradostava
Keen to try this out. Composer 2 is a reliable workhorse and much cheaper than the frontier models. Yes it may be based on Kimi, but it is good, really good. My workflow: - If its simple/obvious - give it to composee 2 immediately - If its complex either work on a plan with ChatGPT (pro mode is insane) or create a plan with GPT 5.5 or GPT 5.3 codex, and then implement with composer I continue to be surprised at how good Anthropic are at getting people to promote an agent harness that doesn't have a decent UI. Cursor has as good (arguably better) coding agent AND a decent UI. Yes its forked from VS Code, but who cares it's good. I tried Zed the other day, but can't really see the advantage - on a decent mac performance is the same, and Cursor is more polished. Anthropic may be winning the PR battle but I think cursor is laughing all the way to the bank.
therepanic
Why should I pay more for a Chinese model's wrapper? Or is Cursor's subscription more subsidized than Kimi's? Anyone know?