Company Offering '100% Human-Written, Never AI' Medical Research Is 100% AI
Anon84
122 points
27 comments
August 12, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 61.5ms across 4,128 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Company Offering '100% Human-Written, Never AI' Medical Research Is AI Errorcod3 · 14 pts · August 11, 2026 · 99% similar
- Proof of care in the age of AI jfil · 177 pts · July 14, 2026 · 51% similar
- We don't use AI in any of our design or production processes tony_cannistra · 99 pts · July 15, 2026 · 51% similar
- I'm Sick of Reading AI-Written Posts gurjeet · 15 pts · August 21, 2026 · 51% similar
- I'm Done Using AI jaredcwhite · 30 pts · August 12, 2026 · 51% similar
Discussion Highlights (9 comments)
anigbrowl
I got downvoted the other day for saying that anonymous website ownership and perverse financial incentives are bad for the health of the internet.
RevEng
I think this will become ever more common as AI improves. We used to joke, "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog," but now that is clearly true for AI agents. They can automate every part of the process, from domain and hosting registration, to web content creation, to responses to emails and even phone calls. Entire personas are trivial to create and maintain. This is what many companies are openly trying to do as cost cutting measures, but taken to its extreme you end up with entire companies generating income that are entirely agent driven. So long as the tokens cost less than the revenues they can generate, people will deploy these to passively make money for them, just like the early 2000s when there were entire webpages just present to show ads to unsuspecting visitors.
GolfPopper
So the government is going to track down everyone involved with running Research Gold and prosecute them for fraud, right?
jbethune
It's interesting to notice which fields try to garner positive publicity by emphasizing that they DON'T use AI. There is increasing negativity about AI generally but it is quite revealing for an organization to try to make their refusal to use it a big part of their identity. Maybe I can start offering artisanal software development services to go after that sweet hipster dollar - code done 100% by hand, cruelty-free.
ElProlactin
One thing that I find useful is to look at the about page, as well as terms of service or privacy policy, of any website. If there's no entity named, or you can't verify that a named entity actually exists, it's a red flag. In this case, there's no individual or company named anywhere that I can see. Not on the About page, and not in any of the legal agreements. And the phone number looks like it's a VoIP number from Onvoy, a major wholesaler, which is a yellow flag.
amanzi
Even the website looks AI generated. Lots of cards with hover effects, icons in square boxes, the button shapes and behaviours, and just the general look and feel has Claude written all over it.
ggm
Surely the FTC would be all over this for truth in advertising, even if the FDA wasn't. The "services for medical researchers" reads like "tell us the result you want and the level of journal prestige and we'll price an outcome for you"
p00dles
Not long ago companies claiming “100% AI-powered” services were secretly relying on humans because the tech wasn’t good enough. Now, the opposite is true - AI has gotten so good, people are trying to pass AI work off as “100% human-powered.” To me this remarkable inversion in a short period of time demonstrates how powerful these models can be; even if AI is overhyped and the financing/economics seem like a stack of cards, this example is driving home the point to me of just how far these models have come.
shaohua
love the irony