Claude Code May–July 2026 weekly limits promotion

alvis 43 points 63 comments July 12, 2026
support.claude.com · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (20 comments)

3333333331

they are panicking!

kunver

power of competition

djsavvy

only through July 19

Yiin

but why? pressure from competition?

jakozaur

Fable is also extended by another week till July 19: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15424964-claude-fable...

yieldcrv

this is basically a SpaceX capacity meter, how fast they add

sunaookami

More context: https://x.com/claudeai/status/2076351399999557669 >We're extending Claude Fable 5 access on all paid plans, as well as keeping Claude Code’s weekly rate limits 50% higher, through July 19.

sp4cec0wb0y

Wonder what is going to happen when these companies can no longer subsidize their models and they have to hike up the prices.

mil22

The triple whammy of (a) two layers of annoying timed usage windows, (b) constantly changing model availability windows, and (c) random unpredictable usage resets, is absolutely brutal for anyone who is trying to plan methodically and be efficient. One minute I'm trying to use an entire week's worth of quota in less than 24 hours, then moments later I read the deadline has been punted and I have only 25% remaining to last me an entire week. This alone is enough for me to switch back to Codex once my current Claude sub ends.

jdw64

Fable model is good, but after a few uses, there's a session limit. Unless you use the API, it's hard to use it for building anything substantial, even though I'm currently on the 10x max plan. So I end up using it mostly for code review. I subscribed to AI to avoid coding, but I'm still coding. I'm just using it as an overseer

fnordpiglet

Hmm ok. The fact 5.6 Sol performs around Fable level and is included without mega token spend in the subscriptions means I’ve promoted codex to my primary harness and model. The latest release of the CLI, app, and desktop fills a lot of the gaps. Anthropic painted itself into a corner with fable at many turns and this latest twist is one of the more interesting. Either fable is too expensive to run at scale, or they’re trying to incentivize mega spend on tokens, or whatever - but them locking the frontier model away for the few enterprises willing to spend top dollar while codex is including frontier in the subscription (and I’ve found it also is both less token hungry and the limits are much higher for codex) has finally made me put Claude aside and use it as my backup for very specific tasks, where codex has filled that spot for a long time now. 50% more weekly limit, but no fable. Ok. I might have a refactoring job somewhere for you Claude for those extra tokens.

Ekaros

Could this be due to vacation season in certain parts of the world? So less demand allows more use of already comitted resources.

jurgenaut23

As I read somewhere, “I smell fear”. But we should all be afraid. Not only Anthropic isn’t anywhere close to being profitable, but the whole gang of frontier labs, breastfed with a mix of VC money and pension funds from the average Joe, is being pressured by Chinese lab. I just hope they find some defensible moat someday, or these $$$ are going to go up in smoke.

js4ever

I smell Fear!

bryzaguy

I was hoping to switch to Claude but was waiting until they had a better model than Codex 5.5. When Fable came out I immediately bought the $100 plan. When the government shut it down they gave the option to cancel which I appreciated. I planned to subscribe again once it was back. However, removing it from the subscription once back has really soured me. I can't help feeling like it was a bait and switch. Even if they added it back, I'm not sure I trust it will stay. I now have no plans to switch back from Codex.

DefineOutside

I can't use Fable at work because all prompts are saved for "safety". I can't use Fable at home as the API pricing is much too expensive while codex is heavily subsidized with generous limits. Who is using Fable?

ctoth

Watching a company I respect turn to the classic "first hit's free" dealer technique does make me feel a certain way. On one hand the thing they are offering is legit great, and how do you get people to use/understand a whole new type of thing without offering them some for free? On the other hand ... you really gonna get people used to an extra 50% then take it away? When this has been most of your new signups experience with the system? The predictable pushback when people realize the workflows they developed over these two months are no longer viable will be ... quite something.

tornikeo

The invisible hand of the free market is working wonders.

varispeed

Fable is cooked. So many sessions ends with you have reached max token limit (despite having credits), sometimes mid way responding. So you have to start again losing all context you built. Looks like another way to scam people.

0gs

i agree this is annoying but i guess i procrastinated the exact right amount of time today. my day just got a lot less anxious

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
14,015 stories · 131,331 chunks indexed