Clanker: A Word for the Machine
llimllib
13 points
7 comments
May 26, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 95.3ms across 8,541 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Clawed jger15 · 13 pts · March 02, 2026 · 54% similar
- I quit. The clankers won domysee · 389 pts · April 01, 2026 · 51% similar
- Stop Anthropomorphizing the Machine speckx · 20 pts · March 06, 2026 · 49% similar
- The Looming AI Clownpocalypse birdculture · 54 pts · March 02, 2026 · 47% similar
- I'm going to build my own OpenClaw, with blackjack and bun rcarmo · 52 pts · March 11, 2026 · 46% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
pmdulaney
I like your explanation of why "agent" is entirely the wrong term to use. But "clanker"? It has such an ugly sound to it. What's wrong with plain old bot ?
stavros
The arguments in this post don't really resonate with me, each for different reasons: > Why Not Agent? I agree, "agent" gives them agency. "Clanker" just sounds like "trashheap" to me, though, a clearly pejorative term. You could go with "harness", "AI", "LLM", "bot", or any of a host of neutral words. No need to reach for something that sounds ugly. > The Machine Has No Feelings Yes, you can't offend a machine, but divisive rhetoric is meant to do just that: Divide. I don't want to see people split into "clanker-lovers" and "clanker-haters". Divisive language just sounds ugly to me because it aims to divide . As a friend put it, if someone were talking to a dog, calmly calling it various pejorative names, even if the dog's feelings weren't hurt, I'd still think less of the person for doing that. > Racism Is About Humans Yes, and there's plenty of scope for humans to divide themselves in identity-politics camps based on their position towards AI. More identity politics isn't something I want to see, so I prefer to use neutral words so the discussion gets elevated, when possible. > AI Is Unpopular Yes, and people are right to not like AI, for various reasons. It's one thing to not like something, and a completely different thing to call it a word that's meant to be a put-down that shuts down thought. > The Word Is Getting Polluted Well, no, not really. You can't use a word that sounds like a slur, and usually is meant to be a slur and complain that it's getting polluted. If anything, you 're the minority user here, and the "polluted" meaning was the intended one. > This is why giving these systems softer, more human language worries me. Then don't! There are degrees between "the agent decided" and "clanker", even though I will point out here that we were fine saying "the autopilot leveled the plane" or "the bank's KYC software deemed the user suspicious".