CJEU: Social networks are the 'publishers' of algorithmically-altered feeds
handelaar
25 points
10 comments
June 16, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 430.0ms across 15,510 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Social media is no longer social frereubu · 31 pts · April 25, 2026 · 57% similar
- Anti-social: It's fads, not friends, which now dominate social media feeds 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 606 pts · June 08, 2026 · 53% similar
- Germany Law to Force Algorithm Boost for State-Approved News 382hi · 39 pts · May 27, 2026 · 52% similar
- Online astroturfing: A problem beyond disinformation (2022) xyzal · 80 pts · March 14, 2026 · 51% similar
- AI content is everywhere on social media, especially LinkedIn mukmuk · 210 pts · July 09, 2026 · 51% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
dotcoma
So, Section 230 does not apply anymore in the EU ?
seydor
EU always about 10 years behind, always insisting it's relevant. Who cares if facebook gets banned, people can curate their own feeds with local AI now, and it's going to be just as bad.
BadBadJellyBean
Good. I am tired of the fact that no one is held accountable for the distortion of reality that is done by algorithmic feeds. These feeds can so easily be used to influence people. The curation of information is a manipulation of the real distribution of opinions.
ChrisArchitect
Title and Source instead of random bluesky: CJEU judgement on whether a Member State may impose restrictions on digital services https://curia.europa.eu/site/jcms/p1_1000084528/en/judgment-...