Chopping up books when they're physically too big
matt_kirkland
155 points
145 comments
September 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 74.2ms across 6,718 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- AI companies destroy physical books – let's scan rare books before it's too late Cider9986 · 222 pts · August 21, 2026 · 54% similar
- AI companies destroy physical books – let's scan rare books before it's too late darccio · 703 pts · August 21, 2026 · 54% similar
- AI companies are shredding rare books anon373839 · 757 pts · July 27, 2026 · 49% similar
- Cherish your physical books and media speckx · 15 pts · August 28, 2026 · 47% similar
- I'm the Guy Who Destroys Antique Books After We Scan Them into Our Company's AI 9woc · 26 pts · August 29, 2026 · 46% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
philips
This is exactly why I love e-books as an adult. As a kid I loved "pocket books"[1] because they didn't make my hand feel weak trying to hold them on a road trip and I could fit a few in my backpack. But, obviously, not every work was published in a pocket book format. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pocket_Books
utopiah
At this point if you don't care at all for the book itself as an object just buy an xteink-x3 with CrossPoint or PocketBook then install Koreader.
SmasherEpilepti
At that rate, you might as well buy and use an e-reader instead. It really doesn't get any more comfortable in the hands than a light device like a Kobo or whatever one you prefer.
drayfield
I hate this. Of course it's your property, you do what you want with it. Do your own illustrations, annotate with abandon, get out the red pen for editing practise... But for me, I love nothing more than reading a book so big that I practically live in it.
globular-toast
I would never do this normally, but when I walked the Camino Primitivo the guidebook contained other routes so was more than twice as big as it needed to. Weight matters so I tore out the bit I needed. I read most fiction these days on my Kobo. I prefer physical volumes when I'm sitting at a desk.
prydt
I came to a similar realization recently. I used to care so much about how pristine my books looked and then I realized that some of my favorite books I have found in used bookstores are ones which are written all over and have a well-worn feel to them. I now annotate all my books with pencil and also write my name in them. I love seeing a history of who's owned a given book when I open the front cover and see a name and phone number.
OroPla
Here I thought this was about shredding your books and going completely digital to save space.
usewik
I do like when books are wrapped, but to the idea of separating them into parts, I would say probably not worth it. Most books I find myself reading lately are pretty dense, and so my focus is on fitting material in my mind and imagination, i.e. into Gardens of the Moon right now, and I am switching between audiobook, small paperback and companion Claude code wrote for me to help me keep track and visualize what's happening. But hey, if it helps you focus on reading, and you own the book, why not? I do think it is better to just go to your library and work through what they have to offer, without buying the books, so that, hopefully leaves slicing off the table.
froobius
I think it's fun. You'll also get the IKEA effect helping you to appreciate the book more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IKEA_effect
specproc
I just did a little sick
spudlyo
This seems like a lot of work for not a huge payoff. I get that the feel and experience of a physical book has a certain nostalgia, but for me, I'd just leave the big monster on the shelf and grab an epub from Anna's Archive. You have already ensured the author and publisher get paid, you might as well read on an e-reader, which is in my opinion superior in nearly every way to a physical book. Ebooks sync across devices, allow for a customized presentation, quick dictionary lookups, bookmarks, etc. The only slight edge I'll give to a physical book is the ability to easily make marginal notes in pencil -- I realize that ebooks have this feature too, it's just not as immediate or as frictionless.
gowld
Quick, someone make a startup to print chopped-up-books on demand.
themanmaran
I have very fond memories of reading hitchhikers guide to the galaxy with a friend in highschool. The book was old and had already started falling apart, and so we just broke it up into chapters and would pass it to the next person one chapter at a time.
ArbriT
I am so confused
DavidVoid
I wish more books would come in the same format as the Macmillan Collector's Library series of books. They're tiny hardback books with thin pages. I just checked my copy of Moby Dick, it's about 770 pages, but the book has a very pocket-able size of just 15.6×10×3.5 cm (6.2×4×1.4").
omoikane
I wonder why the publishers insist on selling thick books like that. The books I read tend to come in multiple volumes, and it's not like I would finish it all at once so I just need to carry at most one or two volumes.
madewithdrama
Nice comment section. Is it necessary to bring up ebooks whenever print books are mentioned? I haven't heard a worthwhile opinion on the matter in at least 15 years. Anyways, cool post.
juiceland
If the gutter is wide enough, you can have them rebound with spiral binding. This is incredible useful for holding or putting a book flat. I did this to all my textbooks in college.
dinkleberg
Giving yourself the old playstation experience. Please insert Disc 2.
starkparker
One of the more unintentional "reject modernity, embrace tradition" posts on this site. In a world where this catches on someone will come up with the bright idea of serialized novels again. It's like a payment plan for a book! More watercooler moments waiting for the next volume! Authors incorporating fan feedback between volumes! Imagine all the Dickensian possibilities.