Canada Says Critics Don't Understand Its Surveillance Bill
Cider9986
20 points
1 comment
May 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 82.4ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Canada’s Bill C-22 Is a Repackaged Version of Last Year’s Surveillance Nightmare Brajeshwar · 320 pts · May 12, 2026 · 70% similar
- Canada's bill C-22 mandates mass metadata surveillance opengrass · 562 pts · March 15, 2026 · 66% similar
- Canada’s Bill C-22 would weaken protections on private messages laurex · 94 pts · May 17, 2026 · 62% similar
- Canada admits bill C-22 would allow govt to secretly order microphone activation CGMthrowaway · 12 pts · May 10, 2026 · 60% similar
- Signal warns it would pull out of Canada if made to comply with access bill gnabgib · 15 pts · May 19, 2026 · 58% similar
Discussion Highlights (1 comments)
ethanplant
I think the most important issue here, as it often is whenever this idea gets floated, is the technical community and the government are talking past each other. Perhaps it is entirely true that the government does not intend to create backdoors. But as engineers we increasingly build systems specifically so that even the provider can’t access the data. So when governments describe requirements around lawful access, compelled assistance, or preserving access capabilities, many engineers look at those requirements and conclude: “that is effectively a backdoor.” The intent may be one thing, but the actual reality is another, and that distinction matters.