Calling all open source maintainers working with Ruby
arto
14 points
10 comments
July 26, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 60.9ms across 6,054 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Interview with a Maintainer ryangibb · 19 pts · July 24, 2026 · 54% similar
- How to Start a Ruby Meetup mooreds · 62 pts · July 09, 2026 · 48% similar
- How to Write Unmaintainable Code (2015) theanonymousone · 18 pts · July 17, 2026 · 43% similar
- Government Rails Site Hit Hours After CVE Patch rietta · 84 pts · September 04, 2026 · 43% similar
- Rails Is Done birdculture · 18 pts · August 10, 2026 · 42% similar
Discussion Highlights (8 comments)
beanjuiceII
forcing things ppl dont really want pretty weird vibes
matheusmoreira
Centralization is bad. When people offer a convenient forum, the price is to bend the knee to their rules instead of one's own. There's also the funding question.
tracerbulletx
I'm not a ruby dev, but what makes this forum authoritative? It launched 7 months ago and the admins seem to be some random business owners? The posts have a couple of replies each? Like this feels as newsworthy as if I hosted a forum called myrubyforum.org and announced all ruby projects should move there?
shevy-java
Ruby should go back to oldschool, before things such as splitting the community, adding arbitrary 100.000 download limits (past that point you can no longer remove your project from rubygems.org; on github.org there is no such restriction. This madness comes from top-down people thinking they control the ecosystem). As for the idea itself: it is not a bad idea but sounds way too bureaucratic. It should be automated or automatable, no matter where, be it hosted on codeberg or github. Say I have a project on codeberg; I would like a subforum or something like that, so I'd register this via some commandline gem or so that does that. (Also, https://www.rubyforum.org/ is looking strange to me ... github issue trackers or discussion seem more logical to me). Can that be styled or themed? I mean, having alternatives to github is a nice thing but I can't quite imagine how it looks. They should do some screenshots, overview, demo or something like that.
doublerabbit
Sounds like jealousy of "Coded in Rust". "Hosted on rubyforum" has a ring to it I guess. I like Ruby but its vibe now feels more magnetic to drama since all the mishaps.
tonyhart7
this would be good idea if the forum exist way back when ruby born
buildwrangler
I share the concerns of too much OSS project discussions being centralized in a single place could end up with a single point of failure.
cube00
It's concerning that they're going with Discourse tags instead of categories so project maintainers will never be allowed to moderate their own spaces. The way sponsors will be allowed to "gain visibility within a growing targeted audience" is also vague. [1] [1]: https://products.rubyforum.org/sponsors#:~:text=gain%20visib...