Bullshit Machines
Arodex
27 points
13 comments
May 12, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 1254.3ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- The Rise of the Bullshittery dxs · 158 pts · May 12, 2026 · 62% similar
- Smol Machines fumplethumb · 13 pts · July 02, 2026 · 55% similar
- Knitting bullshit ColinEberhardt · 439 pts · May 06, 2026 · 53% similar
- Machines Don't Press Play weatherreport · 15 pts · June 04, 2026 · 53% similar
- OpenAI's $1T Bullshit Is Falling Apart [video] devonnull · 13 pts · June 22, 2026 · 50% similar
Discussion Highlights (11 comments)
Arodex
From the same authors of "Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World"[0], Carl Bergstrom and Jevin West. [0] https://callingbullshit.org/
damnitbuilds
A 10,000 word website about bullshit machines. See what they did there ?
wewewedxfgdf
Clearly just an anti AI rant packaged up in a fancy suit.
kerblang
> One computer scientist speculated that his LLM had attained sentience. > How did he reach that conclusion? Basically, he asked “Are you conscious?”, the machine responded “Yes”, and that was that. Oh, come on now. This is referring to Blake Lemoine, and while I doubt his conclusions, he wasn't being as simplistic as all that. He's not completely stupid.
jrflo
Was this written in 2022?
dTal
What an obnoxious website. I'm not clicking through your silly javascript animated slideshow one sentence at a time just to read an article.
thegrim33
That's surely a professional, non-sensationalist, title that's appropriate for university professors.
redlewel
horrible design on the website please just give me a block of text to read
MarkusQ
It's nice to see someone else that recognizes that the Emperor is naked. I find it somewhat disturbing how many people seem to fall for the Eliza-effect illusion that LLMs are thinking.
simianwords
This website is not worth your time. > LLMs operate in the plane of words, not in the world of physical phenomena that science investigates. They don’t reason, synthesize evidence, or draw upon the previous literature. They can generate text that looks like a paper but mistaking this for science is a cargo-cult fallacy. This is clearly wrong
ChrisArchitect
Previously: Feb 2025 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42989320