Bricks and Minifigs Parts Ways with Franchise Owners
cheschire
17 points
9 comments
June 05, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 101.7ms across 10,324 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Bricks and Minifigs Stole a Man's $200k Lego Collection philips · 778 pts · May 28, 2026 · 63% similar
- "Bricks & minifigs can stuff it" – Patreon CEO [video] ShinyLeftPad · 12 pts · June 06, 2026 · 58% similar
- I Must Attempt to Explain the Lego Scandal Rocking YouTube State of Utah Cider9986 · 38 pts · June 04, 2026 · 50% similar
- Patreon Refuses to Remove YouTuber's Viral Lego Investigation healsdata · 46 pts · June 03, 2026 · 47% similar
- FIRST Robotics founder Dean Kamen resigns because of Epstein files benwen · 16 pts · March 23, 2026 · 42% similar
Discussion Highlights (8 comments)
cheschire
related from last week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314136
anenefan
Um yes so that happened, though a guess is since an archive of the going ons got into the public 3rd June, [1], the company could guess they run the possibility of landing in proverbial hot water ... time to cut losses. [1] https://archive.org/details/american-fork-bodycam-unredacted Edited for clarity.
cbarnes99
They keep saying unauthorized consignment agreement. Except that they've yet to make public so much as a single document showing that the franchisees were not allowed to do consignment. And the previous owners shared their franchisee agreement which explicitly authorized them to do consignment.
Fire-Dragon-DoL
They keep digging their grave, looks like
ahofmann
They don't seem to understand, that there is no way out of it except giving the guy all the Lego sets or 200k dollars and saying "we are very sorry" multiple times. They're still trying to save their face and money and it might ruin the whole franchise.
Calavar
> While fact investigation continues, BAM’s current state of its investigation has uncovered significant evidence of gross negligence in how the store was previously operated by the prior owner Verbal diarrhea. Excessive passive tense and vagueries to dilute blame (who is the "prior" owner here - Johnson or the woman before they've been trying to scapegoat?) and to top it off multiple grammatical errors in a single sentence. I can't believe they would let this draft hit the website in its current form this in the midst of what could be an existential crisis for there company.
cam_l
Seems like with this kind of carry on, they could possibly end up in breach of their supplier agreement with Lego itself. Crazy that they would risk that for a little spat. I guess they thought strong arm tactics would silence the story. The fact they think it ok to admit to using their countersuit (against Bryan, the Lego owner) as leverage in this very post is wild.
flowerthoughts
So instead of freezing operation until the consigned was worked out, they tried to bully their way to success. That's one way to do business. As a passionate ex-LEGOer, I hope BAM is toast. LEGO now is not a company I care about due to their insane fixation on brands and collectibles rather than making children discover the world. But in that spirit, BAM has shown they're not even a good brand ambassador in this business setting.