BookStack Moves from GitHub to Codeberg
RadiozRadioz
78 points
13 comments
April 28, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 1026.0ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Moving from GitHub to Codeberg, for lazy people jslakro · 568 pts · March 26, 2026 · 55% similar
- GitHub Stacked PRs ezekg · 603 pts · April 13, 2026 · 55% similar
- Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives Gedxx · 349 pts · July 09, 2026 · 51% similar
- Google copybara: moving code between repositories reconnecting · 152 pts · June 30, 2026 · 50% similar
- Media scraper Gallery-dl is moving to Codeberg after receiving a DMCA notice MoltenMonster · 94 pts · April 06, 2026 · 48% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
calpaterson
As best I can see, bookstack has not experienced much in the way of concrete issues with Github. And there there are no concrete benefits from migrating to Codeberg. It is his project, his perogative, completely. But the major disbenefit of being on some other forge is that people are less likely to find the software and so less likely to adopt it. I use Bookstack for a family wiki. I probably would not have gone with it if it had not be hosted on Github as the visible activity on Github makes it clear that it's a project with momentum (18k stars, lot's of activity) etc. I can't help but feel that moving will make the project less successful than otherwise...
square_usual
I feel like this is a much better link for this: https://www.bookstackapp.com/blog/project-migrated-to-codebe...
ursuscamp
OSS is increasingly bisecting into two camps, and you can tell which camp they are in depending on whether their developers use X or Mastodon/Bluesky.
beanjuiceII
good for you but do we need to post every no name project that moves away from github? feels weird