Big Tech Oligarchs Have a Terrible Plan for Humanity
01-_-
69 points
42 comments
October 19, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 138.2ms across 9,963 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- We Can't Let Enormous Weirdos Regulate AI SLHamlet · 43 pts · September 28, 2026 · 63% similar
- Big Tech's Frantic Race to Quell the Growing Backlash to AI newsomix9xl · 18 pts · August 26, 2026 · 63% similar
- Microsoft says AI rival Anthropic could have 'disastrous impact' on humanity pluc · 40 pts · September 16, 2026 · 62% similar
- AI companies in race to demonstrate their model most threatening to humanity ljewalsh · 428 pts · September 28, 2026 · 61% similar
- Anthropic CEO says AI swarm could 'take over the Internet' in 6-12 months pseudolus · 12 pts · September 13, 2026 · 60% similar
Discussion Highlights (9 comments)
classified
These technofascists are today's equivalent to the eugenicists of 100 years ago. They believe they have the singular vision and the moral authority to dictate the future of humanity. But it's also different this time because these maniacs come with the power of perverse amounts of money and control over actual technology. We let them become that big and powerful and I have an inkling we might come to regret it.
classified
https://archive.is/gvPFC
akudha
Forget Billions or even 100s of millions. If I had a single digit million dollar fortune to my name, nobody will hear from me again. I'll go to a quiet corner and just read books or garden or whatever. If I can be of any help/use to those less fortunate than me, I will. If I can't do that, then I'll keep quiet and live out my life. I cannot fathom going out of my way to create chaos, to be cruel, to make lives miserable for millions of people, and worst of all, call it "progress". I just don't understand how these people think. Maybe I am just too poor, too dumb...
Refreeze5224
This is the inevitable result of a system that equates capital with power, and relies on an uneven distribution of said capital-power. A system designed for inequality will result in equality, and those with power-capital will only find more and better ways to increase their power-capital, to the detriment of us all. Humankind is doomed if we do not find a better way than capitalism.
AndrewKemendo
Does anyone have a better long term plan for the species? The full article is paywalled, so does Bernie (who seems generally great) have a 10,000 year plan for the species? We can’t even solve 1 year problems as a nation, so the probability of global human community aligning to stall our breakneck self destruction via AGW or war is zero. Humans have only dominated the planet for 250,000 years, who says we’re supposed to continue that? Dinosaurs dominated for millions and they are gone there’s no universal mandate that humans are the final form of intelligence and no reason to believe we are. Last I checked we’re all extinct within 1Billion years and humans can’t survive mass migration off of earth because there’s nowhere to go. This is the only option
tim333
This is Bernie Sanders not quite getting what's going on. Computers getting more powerful in a Moore's law like way has been going on for decades and if human brains are something like computers of somewhat constant abilities it's inevitable the computers would overtake at some point. It's not really sci fi or an oligarch plan or especially new - I wrote about it for my uni entrance exam 45 years ago and the ideas go back at least to Turing. Most of the stuff mentioned will inevitably happen, oligarchs or not and we should plan to make the best of it. Some of the things - merge, immortality and super intelligence could be quite cool. I imagine it'll be voluntary and some people will live traditionally, some will embrace the tech.
effed3
Someone once wrote that power corrupts, and the greater the power, the greater the corruption. So there is a more concentration of power, more privilege, deeper inequality, and an enhanced capacity to amass further power—all of which creates a perverse feedback loop. It is an age-old story, resurfacing today with greater speed and intensity than ever before. And if the so-called democracy —where it truly exists— is a heuristic method for distributing power across such a broad base that the level of corruption per capita remains below a critical threshold, a point at which moral and cultural antibodies can still function? Who knows.
DemocracyFTW2
Should human beings remain in control of planet Earth? Or should we be replaced as the dominant species? Without thinking too long or too hard I can most definitively think of some dominant individuals that should be replaced. As in, ASAP.
tim333
https://wallhop.io/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/10...