Ask HN: Would you use a job board where every listing is verified?
Online job scams seem increasingly common. I'm curious whether people would actually use a job board where every job listing is verified before being published. Would something like this make you more likely to search for jobs there?
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
antonymoose
What makes a job verified in this case? You can easily verify a firm exists, but that’s not really the critical part. The question “is this a ghost job with no intention to be filled” is the real struggle.
fogzen
I want a job board that can filter companies like ATS filters candidates. I want to know salary, benefits, equity comp, tech stack, and workflow practices like CI, test suite time, test coverage, meetings per week, etc.
hwhshs
It exists. Linkedin seems to have such jobs.
raw_anon_1111
No. A job being “verified” doesn’t solve the main problem post around 2023. Every single job opening gets hundreds of openings within the first day of it being opened. If you are looking for a job as any type of generic developer - full stack, front end, mobile, back end, it’s almost impossible to stand out from the crowd. No, “I reversed a btree on the whiteboard to get into big tech as a mid level developer” doesn’t make you special. If you do have a specialized set of skills that allows you to stand out from the crowd, you still shouldn’t be randomly spamming job boards and you should be able to sell yourself to someone at the company. My personal anecdote. In my specialty - AWS + app dev + leading strategic initiatives, I’m very well credentialed (trust me on this) and in a certain niche of AWS, I was considered one of the industry experts at the time (again trust me). But when randomly spamming job boards on a lark in 2023, I heard nothing. That was always a plan B while I was waiting for what ended up being three offers via my network and one by reaching out to a company who specialized in my niche of AWS. I’m not bragging, I am old . I should have a network and credentials.
1123581321
Probably not, as you’d essentially be performing the function of a recruiter, but not providing the ability for applicants to skip the initial steps of the hiring process by talking to you. Recruiters already list their open jobs in board-like software.
brudgers
To a large degree, the problem with job boards is job boards are a two sided market for lemons On the one hand, applicants are applicant who cannot find a job through people they know and the companies are companies who cannot find candidates through people they know Good jobs and good employees come through relationships and you cannot automate relationships. Relationships are hard. Good luck.
dzonga
what's the value add ? what are you offering to candidates - a better interview experience (been tried before etc, those companies closed) you want to solve a problem, however you are trying solve the problem at a wrong abstraction level - the problem with the tech market hiring is a coordination problem
bootsmann
Imo it might be worthwhile creating a job board that solves the “company-side” issue with the current recruitment process where 200 people will spam AI generated slop CV to every post that opens up. Some kind of account coupled with a ratelimit and you should already deliver some value to people recruiting.
moralestapia
The answer is yes, and I speak for everybody. People use job boards anyway, why not use another one with the +1 that, at least, you won't get scammed. Everyone likes to pretend this and that, "I wouldn't do it", "what problem do you solve", etc. I've published many jobs and they all come like hyenas fighting over scraps. Don't listen to them, just build the thing; they'll use it, they need the bread, lmao.
bitfilped
No, I don't use job boards.
hmokiguess
What’s an example of a job scam? How does the scammer benefits from it? I have never heard of this, just looking to learn more about it.
neom
https://www.news.google.com/search?q=ghost+jobs - ghost jobs are a real problem - I don't know if this is the solution.
pluc
Verified how? The poster has an account? No The poster has confirmed an email address? No The poster has a confirmed email address that is associable to the business? Maybe The poster has a confirmed email address that is associable to the business and their name is verifiable as HR/Hiring Manager/Someone in a legitimate position to post this offer? Sure
spy888
You have to think through the applicant issue. As a hiring manager every time I post a job i get hundreds of applicants and most are not viable for different reasons. A verified listing does nothing to help me deal with the influx of low quality and fake applicants.
joeyguerra
the job-to-be-done is connecting the job to the right person. Not job verification. I built a mobile app dev team in fintech years ago. I remember one person was literally selling their house and moving and was looking for a job. Call it luck, serendipitous, what you will, but the "connection" was made at the right time, right place. How do we solve that problem more effectively? Cuz right now it's a roll of the dice, constant linkedin messages, etc.
siliconc0w
Cyrpto had some interesting takes on these sort of problems that we haven't really applied more broadly. The way I'd design a job board is require the applicant to escrow X and the job poster to escrow Y*X. Y is is the trust ratio. Given a bad experience, either the side can 'burn' the other and send both escrowed amounts to charity. An okay trust ratio might be 10, meaning they'll give you 10:1 burn ratio. A good one might be 100 or 1000. At that point they are essentially handing you a big stick to beat them with if they misbehave. This would entirely eliminate spam and ghost jobs - suddenly everyone would be magically really responsive and polite.
smnscu
Otta in the UK (now eaten by the inexplicably-named Welcome to the Jungle) used to have a very involved vetting process during company onboarding, and I could verify that it was a great service as both a candidate and a hiring manager. To replicate what you want ("every listing is verified") there's no silver bullet but a good vetting process like that goes a long way. Another site I like is cord.com, which seems to prioritise companies where recruiters are active on that website, I've had a good experience with that one as well, as you get to chat with an actual recruiter in a matter of hours or days.
1970-01-01
Hiring is so broken that this just isn't enough. We really need an IETF RFC for open positions. A full-blown TCP-like protocol for an open position, with TTL, SYN ACK handshakes, and data encryption. Anything else is half-assing it. I'm only half joking. It's pretty bad today.
diego_moita
No. Ghost jobs are "verified", too.
nbhdcity
I don’t want my application to be swallowed up in the deluge of bot applications either tho. Can you verify the other applicants too even maybe clearing that they meet a minimal qualification so my qualifying application actually gets reviewed?