Apple M6 Pro achieves the highest single-core CPU score in Geekbench 7
gainsurier
117 points
141 comments
September 19, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 75.4ms across 7,105 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- A20 Pro shatters Geekbench 7 single-core record – beats desktop i9 and Ryzen 9 scrlk · 28 pts · September 15, 2026 · 73% similar
- Apple introduces M6 and M5 Ultra interpol_p · 1055 pts · August 25, 2026 · 67% similar
- Geekbench 7 ilreb · 56 pts · July 23, 2026 · 66% similar
- New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro runako · 466 pts · August 25, 2026 · 64% similar
- Xiaomi: New CPU matches Apple cores single threaded, much faster multithreaded tosh · 799 pts · August 24, 2026 · 62% similar
Discussion Highlights (12 comments)
galad87
Cool, but Apple didn't announce any M6 Pro yet, so where is this coming from?
aurareturn
Wait. What? This is actually the M6 Pro and not the M6. It has 18 CPU cores to the M6's 12. The scores line up as well. Reports have said all along that Apple is skipping M6 Pro/Max to focus on M7 generation. I can't remember the last time an Apple chip got leaked like this.
mdp2021
And how much would it cost? In the current times performance/price seems to be increasingly important. (Not to mention several other factors that once did not even exist, or were irrelevant.)
OsrsNeedsf2P
I'm currently in the middle of porting a game from 2004 to run on MacOS via wine. On a 5000$ Macbook Pro, I'm getting about 4 FPS. This has multiple causes, including the game being single threaded and running through Rosetta, but damn is it hard to get good single core performance out of Macbooks. Out of curiosity, I also ported the game to arm Linux with fex + upstreamed the wine patches in about a third the time and there's no FPS issues
a3w
>4k? Thought not would barely twice that of an 15 year old CPU, but it of course is geekbench 7, not 6 or 5! So this is different and faster than such a result in the old scoring would have implied.
leptons
Under exactly what cooling conditions? And for how long did it sustain this speed?
GeekyBear
There are also leaks for the M5 Ultra & Base M6. M5 Ultra CPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/search?k=parkdale_cpu&q=mac17%... M5 Ultra GPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/search?k=grand_gpu&q=mac17%2C1... Base M6 CPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/search?k=parkdale_cpu&q=mac18%... Base M6 GPU: https://browser.geekbench.com/search?k=grand_gpu&q=mac18%2C5 The Base M6 CPU single core is averaging a bit over 4000 on Geekbench 7. For comparison, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 averages 3161 on the same test. https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/amd-ryzen-9-9950x3d... The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus averages 2940 on the same test. https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/intel-core-ultra-7-...
asimovDev
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/single-thread/ https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/singlecore here are the leaderboards for anyone else who was curious
rbanffy
Has anyone tried to run Geekbench on POWER11 or a Telum II?
khoirul
I will never understand how an intelligent, opinionated crowd like HN can be so obsessed over Apple's CPU offerings. Buying into the Mac ecosystem is without a doubt subjecting oneself to vendor lock-in. Linux won't even run on these machines until in 2-3 years, if you're lucky.
gainsurier
Sorry everyone, this submission appears to be forged—the L1 and L2 caches don't match up m4 pro and m5 pro
5555watch
Would be interesting to see Speedometer 3.1 tests as well. I find they translate really well to user experience, and previously the M5 Base was beating the equivalent Ryzen/Intel there as well.