Apple AI servers unused in warehouses due to low Apple Intelligence usage
_____k
85 points
83 comments
March 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 48.5ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Amazon Employees Say AI Is Just Increasing Workload jamesgill · 83 pts · March 12, 2026 · 54% similar
- So where are all the AI apps? tanelpoder · 387 pts · March 24, 2026 · 54% similar
- Half of planned US data center builds have been delayed or canceled speckx · 11 pts · April 03, 2026 · 54% similar
- Half of planned US data center builds have been delayed or cancelled jnord · 12 pts · April 03, 2026 · 54% similar
- Apple Can Create Smaller On-Device AI Models from Google's Gemini thm · 25 pts · March 25, 2026 · 54% similar
Discussion Highlights (10 comments)
abeyer
they should just scalp the RAM on ebay, that's what people actually _want_ to buy, not ai
Legend2440
What are these servers actually used for? The Siri+LLM features of Apple Intelligence aren’t launched yet, and the other features like notification summaries run on-device.
siva7
Imagine launching such a shitty product that AI servers are sitting unused in 2026.
castral
Yeah but this is how Apple has always done infrastructure/services. Their internal software teams are a mess. They constantly reinvent the wheel poorly, and then they charge a premium for exclusive access. Is anyone surprised by this?
Hasz
The rest of the FAANG has invested very heavily in cloud while Apple seems to be a laggard. GCP, AWS and Azure are all publicly available products, and cloud at Netflix, Meta seems very mature for a private offering. This is not a huge disadvantage in my opinion. Let the rest of big tech fight each other to death over cloud, while controlling a very profitable differentiated offering (devices+services). Apple keeps the M series HW out of data centers, even though it presents some very attractive performance/w and per-core numbers.
teeray
Just like Siri, it’s completely useless. I don’t need Apple Intelligence to summarize my text messages. I can skim them nearly as fast.
wizardforhire
Taken another way given apple’s enormous market reach, this could be seen as perhaps the most solid metric of actual consumer interest in ai and features ignoring hype.
righthand
Apple will utilize them when needed and scoop up extra capacity after the bubble burst.
eagerpace
I've been wondering about this failed Apple Intelligence project, but the more I think of it, Apple can afford to sit and wait. In 5 years we're going to have Opus 4.6-level performance on-device, and Apple is the only company that stands to benefit from it. Nobody wants to be sending EVERY request to someone else's cloud server.
rsynnott
I mean I think a lot of it is that they're not _really_ forcing it upon people. I think I've declined it maybe twice over the last two years. Meanwhile, Google are trying to crowbar bloody gemini in _everywhere_, and I gather Microsoft is doing ditto.