Anthropic Walks Back Policy That Could Have 'Sabotaged' Researchers Using Claude
ericflo
29 points
12 comments
June 11, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 116.2ms across 10,094 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Anthropic Races to Contain Leak of Code Behind Claude AI Agent sonabinu · 21 pts · April 01, 2026 · 57% similar
- Anthropic investigating unauthorised access of powerful Mythos AI model finghin · 17 pts · April 22, 2026 · 56% similar
- How Talks Between Anthropic and the Defense Dept. Fell Apart m-hodges · 38 pts · March 02, 2026 · 56% similar
- OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 138 pts · April 05, 2026 · 55% similar
- After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber gbourne1 · 139 pts · May 01, 2026 · 55% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
impulser_
It's kinda weird to think the Chinese AI labs might be more trust worthy than the US labs. - Anthropic is ran by a bunch of nut jobs. - OpenAI is ran by a guy you can't trust. I don't even know if we should include DeepMind, Meta, or xAi in the conversation of AI labs at this point since they can't produce models better than Chinese labs.
rvz
Too late. We now all know that Anthropic CAN do that if they want to. The fact that they told you upfront about it shows that their arrogance on this self-sabotage against their customers is at stratospheric levels. Believe them the first time, and they are not your friends at all.
nmfisher
Call me a cynic, but I don't believe this is a genuine change of heart at all. It feels much more like a panicked response to something that might undermine their IPO. Even if you trust Anthropic today (which I don't), they clearly don't want competition and there's no telling what other shady moves they'll pull in future. The only sustainable way forward is to support open models. I was already on the fence about whether or not to keep my Max subscription (the extra cost over something like DeepSeek V4 didn't really feel justifiable). This is the tipping point for me, I'll be cancelling my sub before it renews at the end of the month.
LoganDark
https://archive.ph/yxYhU
SilverElfin
The damage is done. They designed Fable to be dishonest and sabotage-y. Look at this report of Claude now randomly changing AI software without being asked to: https://xcancel.com/hammer_mt/status/2064839924398825798 This is so completely dishonest. But it also shows how deeply anti competitive Anthropic is. They will talk about safety but it’s not actually about safety: building features like this seems intended to hurt competition in the AI space. They don’t mind if AI helps YOUR competitor but if it means competition for them, they suddenly have a problem with it. I don’t care that they walked this back. They’ve shown who they are. And what they’re capable of.