AMD pulls a bait-and-switch on Linux users with Vivado licensing changes
teleforce
330 points
157 comments
May 28, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 87.2ms across 8,861 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Why Is Vivado 2026.1 Dropping Linux Support for Free Tier? zdw · 48 pts · May 24, 2026 · 66% similar
- AI vendor lock-in bites back samizdis · 25 pts · April 28, 2026 · 53% similar
- AMD Ryzen AI NPUs Are Finally Useful Under Linux for Running LLMs mikece · 27 pts · March 11, 2026 · 52% similar
- California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verification law after backlash rbanffy · 790 pts · May 25, 2026 · 50% similar
- FFmpeg developer calls out OxideAV for AI license laundering of his code dmitrygr · 26 pts · May 06, 2026 · 49% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
wewewedxfgdf
It's long been said: "AMD never misses a chance to miss a chance." In this case, the chance to trash its reputation with customers.
azalemeth
I have specifically chosen AMD _many_ times in the past precisely because of their better linux support and more open toolchain. This is an absolute foot-gun moment. And the gaslighting PR responses are just unacceptable. I'm very disappointed in them.
bravetraveler
Incredible, behaving as if they want another CUDA situation.
donohoe
Discussion from 4 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254309
officialchicken
Advanced Marking Disaster original thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254309
zx8080
> Starting with the 2026.1 release Don't upgrade. It's just that simple. Do they offer some unique features in the new version or is it a habit to upgrade everything every day?
ginko
When AMD bought Xilinx I was hoping they'd open up the software side like they (eventually) did with their GPU drivers. Looks like that isn't happening anytime soon. It seems silly to put up SW barriers for people to use your fairly expensive HW, but what do I know.
dgacmu
Large company again makes local decision without considering the effects outside that single product line. I wonder how many Linux GPU sales their decision to penalize Linux on their FPGA line will cost them.
rvz
Earlier discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254309 Also this site (itsfoss.com) is unusable and riddled with hundreds of ads and sets my machines fans to full blast. At least use another credible source or go to the source instead as per the HN guidelines.
tux3
The rumor on the FPGA reddit is that they're going to walk it back. Quote: 'The only source I can give at this time is "trust me bro"'
Meneth
That's what you get for using unfree software.
linuxftw
This software seems to never have been open source/freely licensed. That's not a bait and switch. They were giving you a commercial product, for free, and now have decided not to. It's likely a case where maintaining separate builds for the free and commercial tiers was getting complex. Often times, this kind of software requires lots of manual reviewing and adding or removing modules, and they probably decided it's just not worth it.
cozzyd
I mean perhaps the silver lining is the projects I use are all stuck on 2022.1 for now. I wonder if this is because they want to gate usage by AI agents.
Hnrobert42
Folks feel outrage when companies start charging for things that were once free. Okay, but what if you run a company whose business model no longer supports giving away free stuff? How can you transition? What would users consider less outrageous?
boomskats
Pretty sure this 'article' was written by an LLM, having scraped the HN discussion on here from 4 days ago. Nothing new there apart from a clickbait title and a ton of ads. Link to my comment, so that I don't repeat myself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48256417
pjmlp
Always think about stuff like this, when asserting how much better AMD happens to be versus NVidia.
lvl155
AMD is not a good company. They stopped innovating after Intel was put down. Except, now Intel has govt backing while AMD will face significantly more competition from not only x86 but arm. Stock price says otherwise but I think they had more than enough time to catch up to Nvidia and simply refused to compete.
adapteva
Exactly why we zero asic is making Platypus devices open bitstream and all tooling foss from day one...to protect the world against future evil/dumb version of ourselves. https://www.zeroasic.com/platypus https://www.zeroasic.com/projects/wildebeest https://www.zeroasic.com/projects/logik Of course we don't have silicon yet...so nobody here cares. I think a lot of people forget that Xilinx spent $10B+ develop their awesome devices. I figure we can do it with 1/10th of that.;-)
oytis
Never understood why FPGA vendors do it. Do they desperately want to show software ARR to shareholders?
snarfy
I'm guessing it works fine under Wine.