AI usage patterns in software teams

jdw64

These days, my work has become: generate code for 20 minutes, then spend an hour reading it.

0xbadcafebee

> Time spent on customer requests, docs, and projects held steady [..] AI has so far changed how teams execute far more than how they decide what to build I think the measurement for this may be flawed. We do mostly use AI to decide how to build. But what we build is influenced by AI-driven research into a problem or task. That's largely done in coding and desktop AI tools, not Linear Asks/AI. I'm working on accelerating my team's work by implementing AI-driven code pipelines with guardrails to eliminate as much unnecessary review time as possible. Also making a chatbot for turning repetitive tasks & PRs into buttons, and an "architectural guidance" chatbot that gives advice tailored to our business, software/system architecture, cloud, standards, etc. This puts AI and automated jobs in the center of both how (automated task) and what (architecture guidance). But this has a not-so-great implication for Linear. With my tools, a human never has to touch a ticket, so we could use any ticketing system with an API or CLI. Linear is a great product because they made a great interface. What happens when I replace their interface with a chat bot?

greatgib

"Pull requests are up 111% in two years". Would be more honest to say that the number of pull requests "detected" by linear are up XXX%. Because it only works if you setup git repo tracking and use it properly. And at that point it is not obvious if more teams are using linear and using it correctly, or if the number of PR really increased that much!

gkamal

This looks like measuring what is easy to do, rather than what really matters. PR open counts, issues created , ceos/founders spending more time on linear don't automatically lead to better outcomes (in my experience they are often negatively correlated:-) )

slopsosn

The AI Slopologists strike again. More garbage by garbage people.

agnishom

I didn't know Linear has "AI features". Linear is boring, but that's actually fine by me. I use LLMs to write my code, but this does not show up in this data.

sebiandev

this seems inappropriate. I think its a bad paradigm that just because you use a platform's service, they get intimate details about your usage. And for them to be so bold about publishing the statistics they've stolen from their customers data? Gives me a reason to never recommend my org use this platform.