AI Data Centers Not Paying Their Costs, Will Keep Using NDAs and Seek Tax Breaks
DeepLogin
56 points
8 comments
October 10, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 111.1ms across 9,063 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Meta Uses A.I. Data Centers to Avoid Billions in Federal Taxes gmays · 250 pts · October 01, 2026 · 67% similar
- AI Data Centers and the Concentration of Wealth birdculture · 13 pts · July 16, 2026 · 61% similar
- AI Companies Are Trying to Hide a Staggering Amount of Debt technewssss · 634 pts · July 23, 2026 · 58% similar
- The 'Country Hicks' Who Refused $26M from an AI Data Center impish9208 · 15 pts · August 16, 2026 · 58% similar
- America Turned on Data Centers cdrnsf · 12 pts · October 07, 2026 · 58% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
ethagknight
Some obvious wordsmithing here intended to confuse. These are very weak arguments and I do not understand why it is a material concern to a Congressman other than an interest to interfere in US commerce on behalf of foreign entities. Why is Warren so concerned with a non-federal utility co's market rate agreements, or tax breaks granted by local governments? Its not at all her jurisdiction. 1- Fair Share payments- its a net benefit to all ratepayers if the system is upgraded thanks to expanded revenue from datacenters. Utility operators not correctly charging for services provided is a separate matter. Its reasonable to assume that Warren is getting into nitpicking on "wait who paid for THAT transformer??" Its very possible that some of these utilities are making mistakes, but they have their own board of directors and local oversight to address that matter. 2- NDAs- this was a big talking point in Memphis recently "I want to see the NDAs!!" but we have a utility co MLGW that is pretty effective and has to look out for its own long term interests. Warren has no business demanding to regulate that sort of deal making, unless of course the utility leadership is engage in corruption. Otherwise, its just business as usual that any other business engages in in the United State. 3- Tax Breaks- datacenters have such high price F&E tax related price tags that the laws weren't really written to consider a facility with $100B of value installed. A tax break is reasonable, and it is only "lots govt revenue stolen from schools" or whatever if the government is writing a check back out to the datacenter operation, which they generally are not to my knowledge. A tax that didn't exist yesterday and gets negotiated down for tomorrow is not "lost tax revenue" but an acknowledgment that the tax code, as written, is overly punitive to commerce, which I believe is Warren's goal, on behalf of foreign actors, to throttle US enterprise and dominance in intelligence.
pylua
I usually do not agree with her but I do here. There is a lot of nervousness where I live that the power rates will rise to support the build out in infra for data centers. After working in tech I know they really are only in it to maximize profit at any expense necessary, and I personally do not trust them. If you want buid out data centers fine, but build brand new infrastructure and supply your own water and waste management to not harm the existing community. These companies are making billions and should be able to do this.