AI Contributions to GHC
alexandersechin
16 points
7 comments
October 29, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 148.7ms across 10,991 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Tell HN: AGI Is Here jacquesm · 12 pts · September 25, 2026 · 54% similar
- AI Responsibility – OpenAI and Anthropic getatme32 · 73 pts · September 09, 2026 · 54% similar
- How much of HN is AI? surprisetalk · 255 pts · August 25, 2026 · 54% similar
- Show HN: How much of Hacker News is about AI? beekthos · 69 pts · August 26, 2026 · 54% similar
- Show HN: Parsimony – an open-source benchmark for how much code AI models add lasu · 63 pts · October 13, 2026 · 53% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
eschew
Seems ironic that a blog post describing GHC's AI policy, from a contributor to GHC, which expresses agreement with GHC's AI policy, itself directly violates GHC's AI policy (points P1 and P4)!
cadamsdotcom
To the authors: please include a few words giving context on what a GHC is so people don't have to seek that info out before trying to understand what you're saying Didn't slow me down too much but was still a hassle.
qsdfp
The original guidelines sound more nuanced: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/contributing/AI
memjay
Most important one is human communication. Use AI as much as you want, for research, writing code, reviewing code, etc. But please, keep communicating on a human level. We are slowly loosing valuable communities when only bots are arguing with each other.