AI Companies Are Parasites
cdrnsf
62 points
36 comments
October 05, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 103.6ms across 8,581 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- AI Companies Are Trying to Hide a Staggering Amount of Debt technewssss · 634 pts · July 23, 2026 · 63% similar
- Big AI's content problem: Take the work, keep the money samizdis · 27 pts · September 28, 2026 · 61% similar
- AI's profits are 'being funded by investors rather than earned from customers Anon84 · 28 pts · August 10, 2026 · 61% similar
- AI is a bad tool shtgnwrng · 75 pts · July 13, 2026 · 60% similar
- AI Is in Dangerous Hands frizlab · 16 pts · September 14, 2026 · 60% similar
Discussion Highlights (7 comments)
aogaili
Parasite takes and gives nothing back, but clearly a lot of people are using those models, which the author ignored, so the entire premise is false.
gridspy
Bear in mind that like many toxic blooms, once the investment hysteria feeding them dies out they will die also. - Companies using investment funds to play the Ai Agent lottery will run out of funds - Less tokens will be demanded, causing AI companies to raise prices to pay for overheads - Bubble pops.
simianwords
I find it sad that people don't generally think about non zero sum possibilities. I think it comes from a misreading of Marx because Marx considers value coming from Labor which is purely zero sum. In my bubble within friends and family, practically everyone uses AI and has fun using it and gets value out of it.
senko
The post is a zero-information personal rant (good for him/her!), impossible to comment on without violating at least half of the HN guidelines[0]. [0] literally; even this comment violates a few
altmanaltman
I mean, if you really extend that line of thinking, human beings are parasites in general. We are just sucking up all the resources to make more Walmarts and McDonald's. It would then be fair to say that humans should be dislodged from the earth and should never have attached to it in the first place. However, that would be a simplistic and rather naive view of how society works and does not have a solid moral standing behind the argument other than an emotional appeal: "THE ROBOTS ARE STEALING OUR HUMANITY!!!" Rather, why not go deeper? Why not look at the world around you and see what incentives we've built up that allow us to plow trillions of dollars into this without a second thought. We've seen the bust cycles happen and yet here we are: going all-in on a potential technology that might/might not work out as we are hoping it will. If it truly works out as these companies are hoping then it'll be an economic disaster. If it doesn't work as these companies are hoping then it'll be an economic disaster. Yet the Darios and Altmans of the world always find a way.
discreteevent
Watch the parasites swarm all over this thread. (It's been flagged already). The host (HN) is at the point of suffocation.
smitty1e
> Reddit is selling access to its data, but that data is human-generated and depends on a flagging community the company seems, at best, indifferent to. Well, how much genitAIlia do you need to see?