AI chatbots often validate delusions and suicidal thoughts, study finds
1vuio0pswjnm7
31 points
11 comments
March 18, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 54.5ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- AI users whose lives were wrecked by delusion tim333 · 196 pts · March 26, 2026 · 70% similar
- Chatbots are now prescribing psychiatric drugs Brajeshwar · 14 pts · April 03, 2026 · 65% similar
- Number of AI chatbots ignoring human instructions increasing, study says c420 · 14 pts · March 27, 2026 · 59% similar
- Artificial intelligence-associated delusions and large language models beardyw · 12 pts · March 14, 2026 · 55% similar
- AI toys for children misread emotions and respond inappropriately fredley · 36 pts · March 13, 2026 · 54% similar
Discussion Highlights (7 comments)
jqpabc123
If you ask for it, AI chatbots will validate lots of stuff --- bad business or political decisions for example.
cheald
It's best to think of instruct-tuned LLMs as mirrors rather than intelligences. They generally reflect what you're putting into them, but they do it in a way that can easily masquerade as wisdom. I think this makes it really easy for people to self-delude.
rustyhancock
RLHF optimizes for low creativity sychophants. Possibly this is a bigger problem than LLMs existing at all.
awakeasleep
You can prevent a good bit of this for your friends and family by going into their ChatGPT settings > Personalization > Base Style and Tone: choose Efficient, and then choose "less" for warmth, enthusiasm, and emoji. It makes a remarkable difference.
renewiltord
Should it be legal for mentally disabled people to have free access to Internet services? I believe not. They should have to ask permission from a government proctor if they have a diagnosed mental disability. This will protect them from harm. E.g. if you have free internet access as an ADHD patient it’s just going to ruin your life. Make it so you have to have a video chat with your government proctor and you will help these people live successful lives no longer encumbered by these problems. The proctor would obviously refuse diagnosed schizophrenics access to LLMs. We need to protect our most vulnerable. These tools are like heavy equipment. An impaired user will hurt themselves.
RcouF1uZ4gsC
So like McKinsey consultans but just at the personal level instead of the corporate and government level. And much cheaper.
BoorishBears
Just this week famous SF-local "Purple Ferrari With A Duck Man" (I don't know his real name) went through what seems to be a psychotic break and ended up in an armed standoff with police https://sfstandard.com/2026/03/17/san-francisco-nob-hill-arm... There're some early comments saying he was having apocalyptic delusions reinforced by Gemini: this really seems to be growing as a class of issue. What's strange to me is that, while subtle delusions are hard to deal with, delusions where the model is saying "we are at war now with those who destroyed the Earth" seem like they should be very easy to catch with a classifier, and so do the series of prompt that go this far (you can boil the frog with LLMs, but getting it to encourage violence typically requires some pretty sharp prodding.)