Agent-to-agent pair programming

axldelafosse 34 points 12 comments March 27, 2026
axeldelafosse.com · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (6 comments)

jedisct1

I systematically use reviewers agents in Swival: https://swival.dev/pages/reviews.html Even with the same model (--self-review), that makes a huge difference, and immediately highlights how bad the first iterations of an LLM output can be.

vessenes

I prefer claude for generation / creativity, codex for bull-headed, accurate complaining and audit. Very rarely claude just doesn't "get it" and it makes sense to have codex direct edit. But generally I think it's happiest and best used complaining.

alienreborn

I have been trying a similar setup since last week using https://rjcorwin.github.io/cook/

cadamsdotcom

The vibes are great. But there’s a need for more science on this multi agent thing.

bradfox2

Multi turn review of code written by cc reviewed by codex works pretty well. Been one of the only ways to be able to deliver larger scoped features without constant bugs. I've seen them do 10-15 rounds of fix and review until complete. Also implemented this as a gh action, works well for sentry to gh to auto triage to fix pr.

ph4rsikal

JDS wrote about this https://jdsemrau.substack.com/p/pair-programming-superbill-w...

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
3,471 stories · 32,344 chunks indexed