Agent-to-agent pair programming
axldelafosse
34 points
12 comments
March 27, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 41.5ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Custom programming languages make agents good matsur · 17 pts · March 12, 2026 · 62% similar
- Parallel coding agents with tmux and Markdown specs schipperai · 139 pts · March 02, 2026 · 59% similar
- We should revisit literate programming in the agent era horseradish · 195 pts · March 08, 2026 · 56% similar
- Agents that run while I sleep aray07 · 288 pts · March 10, 2026 · 56% similar
- Show HN: Agent Action Protocol (AAP) – MCP got us started, but is insufficient hank2000 · 11 pts · March 03, 2026 · 56% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
jedisct1
I systematically use reviewers agents in Swival: https://swival.dev/pages/reviews.html Even with the same model (--self-review), that makes a huge difference, and immediately highlights how bad the first iterations of an LLM output can be.
vessenes
I prefer claude for generation / creativity, codex for bull-headed, accurate complaining and audit. Very rarely claude just doesn't "get it" and it makes sense to have codex direct edit. But generally I think it's happiest and best used complaining.
alienreborn
I have been trying a similar setup since last week using https://rjcorwin.github.io/cook/
cadamsdotcom
The vibes are great. But there’s a need for more science on this multi agent thing.
bradfox2
Multi turn review of code written by cc reviewed by codex works pretty well. Been one of the only ways to be able to deliver larger scoped features without constant bugs. I've seen them do 10-15 rounds of fix and review until complete. Also implemented this as a gh action, works well for sentry to gh to auto triage to fix pr.
ph4rsikal
JDS wrote about this https://jdsemrau.substack.com/p/pair-programming-superbill-w...