Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai
semanser
645 points
261 comments
June 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 107.4ms across 9,294 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Apple-OpenAI Relationship Frays, Setting Up Possible Legal Fight helsinkiandrew · 60 pts · May 14, 2026 · 47% similar
- Florida AG files lawsuit against OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman for deceptive practices benwen · 47 pts · June 01, 2026 · 47% similar
- Anthropic Sues Pentagon over 'Supply Chain Risk' Label budoso · 17 pts · March 09, 2026 · 47% similar
- Louis Rossmann offers to pay legal fees for a threatened OrcaSlicer developer iancmceachern · 519 pts · May 10, 2026 · 47% similar
- Comprehensive Response to Bambu's AGPLv3 Violations susanthenerd · 11 pts · May 18, 2026 · 47% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
kasabali
What's the context here?
throwa356262
Had no idea about this. Now I do. Thank you, lawyers. If you ever find yourself out of work use this as your reference to pivot to advertisement
antirez
Note that this is not related to Black Forest Labs Flux, the image synthesis models builders, and is instead related to a PCB AI authoring product called Flux.ai.
luma
Flux.ai offers a PCB design solution which is a clear interest for Adafruit. Anyone have any idea what this is about?
tecleandor
Flux just got funding from Bain and others, and it feels like Adafruit was preparing a post about it. Maybe they contacted Flux to confirm some info and they freaked out? I can't find in archive.org if they had a previous post about it. Also, seems like there a good bunch of complains in Reddit about Flux and its billing... https://old.reddit.com/r/PCB/comments/1t476x4/warning_fluxai...
karmicthreat
Adafruit probably did a review of AI PCB tools. I've used Flux.ai before; it was a pretty bad experience. After about 50-100$ in tokens a couple of times, I couldn't get more than a couple of simple components on the schematic. And not in sensible positions. The product just grinds tokens for little return, in my opinion. I had far better luck wiring together KiCad MCP, SKIDL. There are some AI-driven autorouters out there now. Placement is probably the big issue that needs to be solved now. I could only get about 80% of what I wanted together with my hacky workflow.
inshane
As an electrical engineer who has tried to use it multiple times, I think Flux is an absolutely awful product. No surprise at all that they want to sweep details about their “intellectual property, commercial traction and user base” under the rug.
yodon
> Adafruit’s reporting concerns a matter of public security interest and was conducted in the ordinary course of responsible disclosure
wewewedxfgdf
Suing the industry won't win them customers/friends.
TZubiri
>The letter further asserts claims under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Adafruit accessed only information that Flux’s own systems made publicly available through a server misconfiguration A confession
raphman
Never heard of Flux.ai before. It seems to be a 3D circuit designer with 'AI'. Not sure what the issue between them and Adafruit is. However, people over on Reddit¹ claim that Flux.ai is a little bit scummy. They push users into a beginner trial ($5/month) and then silently charge for usage per token - up to $100 per month. Oh, they also claim that they have "the world's largest community-driven public library of Adafruit products, including footprints, symbols, datasheets, and simulation models" ². I wonder whether they designed these themselves or whether they use existing ones. Could not easily find licenses info. ¹) https://www.reddit.com/r/PCB/comments/18o5zfo/thoughts_on_fl... ²) https://www.flux.ai/sitemap/manufacturers/adafruit
0x59
From what I can tell, the message is When you discover an exploit, only communicate with source (and pray they respond) or get sued. Seems like the position is customers and stakeholders shouldn't be allowed access to this information.
ptorrone
hi everyone, phil and limor here, any questions for now, email press@adafruit.com limor and i are very much looking forward to telling our story.
reactordev
Struck a nerve, but I wouldn’t back down. If they do take you to court, there’s this wonderful thing called discovery.
Falimonda
Had anyone tried AutoPCB ( https://autopcb.app/ ) instead? Seems especially useful when paired with an agentic coding tool!
RagnarD
Looks like Flux.ai got some publicity out of this. Maybe not the kind they wanted - after reading this thread, I'll sure never give them a dime.
Mr_Eri_Atlov
I previously had a passing interest in Flux, now I'm certain it's a fraud.
mannanj
Why do we tolerate this bullying and misconduct from companies that harms us and progress overall? Is there really no solution in this day and age for harmful behavior and aggression and hostility like what it looks like Flux is doing here? I can't believe we don't have an answer, I think it's just that the bad guys are drowning us in noise and making it hard for us to identify the solutions where we band together a la David v Goliath against them.
axegon_
For anyone that has been missing the memo on how to become rich: 1. Make a slop machine that's a wrapper around another slop machine like claude, openai, google or whatever. 2. Hire a lawyer to send threatening emails to anyone that might call you out. 3. Get a few investors that are completely clueless to throw a ton of cash at you for having ai in your product. 4. Profit. Honestly, get a hold of Louis Rossmann, this shit needs to stop.
pavel_lishin
> Adafruit accessed only information that Flux’s own systems made publicly available through a server misconfiguration Does anyone have some more context about what happened here? An uncharitable analogy might be that I misconfigured my front door by not locking it, which doesn't give someone the right to walk in and look around - but I have no idea what Adafruit is specifically being accused of doing.