A Study of Microsoft's Early 2026 Rollout of Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI
softwaredoug
49 points
28 comments
July 13, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 57.8ms across 5,215 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Anthropic runs large-scale code migrations with Claude Code vinhnx · 31 pts · July 19, 2026 · 53% similar
- Maximizing the value of your Claude Code sessions twapi · 170 pts · August 14, 2026 · 51% similar
- AI-Generated GitHub Copilot “Autofix” Allowed Compromise of Snowflake's Jira galnagli · 349 pts · August 17, 2026 · 51% similar
- Why Write Code in 2026 zdw · 20 pts · July 12, 2026 · 51% similar
- Claude Is Not a Compiler bryanmikaelian · 148 pts · July 21, 2026 · 50% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
gojkoa
The study unfortunately looks only at individual productivity, not any org gains, and the big claim in the PDF is that adopters "merge roughly 24% more pull requests" over a four month period. not exactly headline-making material. There's no data in the paper whether those 24% extra pull requests actually added anything more valuable or not.
anshumankmr
>281 billion tokens. Using the least expensive version of Claude Opus 4.6, which costs $5 for every million tokens, that one user alone could have cost Meta more than $1.4 million. And that is based on the pricing that they sell a dollar for less than a dollar so the costs may be much much more.
simonreiff
I really wish this study had chosen to focus on more useful endpoints like revenue, profitability, customer retention, conversion rate, etc....at a minimum, don't look at PRs merged without also looking at bugs in production code, number of incident reports, features shipped, debt log canceled, etc. Even if you only want to consider merged PRs, you should weigh the productivity of the reviewer and whether they are also 24% boosted or else it's just an accounting trick.