A sociotechnical threat model for AI-driven smart home devices
dijksterhuis
81 points
66 comments
July 05, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 1190.0ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Proprietary Software, Hardware and Protocols Face AI-Driven Security Risk dwitcher · 11 pts · May 06, 2026 · 56% similar
- OpenAI's June 2026 Report on Malicious Uses of AI [pdf] jklmnopqrstuvw · 18 pts · June 11, 2026 · 56% similar
- An AI robot in my home kukanani · 17 pts · April 07, 2026 · 56% similar
- AI-powered hacking has exploded into industrial-scale threat, Google says chrisjj · 23 pts · May 11, 2026 · 54% similar
- Anthropic investigating unauthorised access of powerful Mythos AI model finghin · 17 pts · April 22, 2026 · 54% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
cs702
Love the title. I think it's a great idea to associate pervasive surveillance with the all-seeing eye of evil incarnate from The Lord of the Rings. General audiences reading only the title, or coverage of it in the media, will immediately understand it, without having to read or think too much about it.
gsibble
Should domestic workers not be surveilled while doing their job? I get the threat of pervasive AI but this hardly seems like it.
Almondsetat
>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 UK-based DWs This "article" is as good as a blog post
Aurornis
I think this is getting upvoted because the headline is about surveillance with a LOTR reference. The subject is about surveillance cameras that people put in their own homes. I see all of these comments about “the panopticon” or surveilling board members and CEOs from people who have apparently not realized this is about people’s private homes. The authors use prose and structure to look like a scientific study, but they only interviewed some domestic workers and didn’t consider anything else, like the homeowners. I’m sorry, but if I invite a contractor into my house I’ve been putting temporary cameras up. It’s helpful to see when they come and go and it’s invaluable if anything goes wrong and contractors start pointing fingers at each other. Would be great if we lived in a world where everyone was trustworthy without a second thought, but we don’t. If you don’t want to put cameras up in your own home then I support you 100%. If a contractor doesn’t want to work in my home with cameras then I completely support their decision too.
jsLavaGoat
Someone should train models to generate clickbait using this.
IndySun
A thought experiment. Cameras everywhere, zero privacy, some murders. No cameras anywhere, total privacy, probably more murders. If cameras everywhere meant zero crime, would you be for it? Can cameras everywhere ever equate to no crime ever; I don't think so. There's some serious pre-crime notions here too.