A Peter Thiel-Backed Tribunal Is Putting Journalists on Trial
cdrnsf
88 points
27 comments
June 12, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 106.7ms across 10,324 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Peter Thiel Is Building a Parallel Justice System – Powered by AI cdrnsf · 58 pts · April 20, 2026 · 65% similar
- Why Peter Thiel Is Decamping to Argentina simonebrunozzi · 18 pts · May 29, 2026 · 50% similar
- Why Peter Thiel Is Decamping to Argentina JumpCrisscross · 15 pts · May 28, 2026 · 50% similar
- A Dangerous New Attack on Press Freedom petethomas · 16 pts · May 08, 2026 · 50% similar
- Why is US tech giant Palantir suing a small Swiss magazine? charlysl · 22 pts · March 20, 2026 · 49% similar
Discussion Highlights (10 comments)
hsuduebc2
Well, who could have possibly seen that coming right from this person. I'm so much waiting for this ridiculous AI psychosis driven grifters just to stop bothering other people with their bullshit. >“It’s only the top 1 percent who matter. These are the people who are going to be the value creators” when, in his view, AI soon completely transforms just about every aspect of economic life. >Among other criticisms, D’Souza dismisses the value of anonymous sources, believing they are discrediting, no matter the justification
k310
Every supremacist accusation is a confession. Remember, Thiel and Musk are both immigrants. The U.S. legal system is very often a war of attrition. One side can relentlessly sue until the other side is broke, or just threaten. This is the basis of many plea deals, or worse, in the case of Aaron Swartz. Billionaires seem to like it.
blfr
Peter Thiel, who waged a legal war against Gawker Media after it published coverage about his business interests and personal life which upset him This is being very economical with the facts. Gawker outed Thiel as gay against his wishes. And while the guy was in Saudi Arabia. Then they published a revenge porn tape of Hulk Hogan, which is what Thiel used to get them.
seydor
Didn't he move to that place where nazis went ?
bko
> Peter Thiel, who waged a legal war against Gawker Media after it published coverage about his business interests and personal life which upset him. Didn't Gawker publish an illegally obtained sex tape of Hogan and refused to take it down even after a court order?
giantfrog
But on April 21, I received a remarkable email. “Someone has filed an objection against something you wrote,” No one in their right mind is going to do anything other than ignore and/or delete an email this stupid.
doctorpangloss
> We’re the first people to sell adjudication as a service PolyMarket and Kalshi are sort of doing that, you could say, adjudication is a valuable service for gambling. I've always thought that the chatbots were much better judges than lawyers. Some real US courts are adopting chatbots for clerical tasks. Hard to say if you can directly sell the services of judging in a general sense, seemingly the only way that is done is for gambling. separately, @dang, is it possible to just cut out the vamping about anything at the top level that isn't really about what is being written
devindotcom
What a silly little venture. Essentially a vanity publication for rich fools with thin skin. Though very amusing how completely it fell apart at the slightest prodding by this reporter. edit - kind of curious why this was flagged and removed?
Lerc
Good people can do bad things. Bad people can do good things. Evaluate the things, you may do so being aware of their provenance, but if you use that as the starting point of your conclusion then you are just asking for your biases to be confirmed. There does need to be a higher form of journalistic accountability. If Thiel, or any other person on the planet, proposed a fair mechanism that was free from influence, I would support it. For this I don't neet to know who is behind it, I need to know what its goals are, how it operates, and how does it maintain integrity. Certainly coming from an odius person increases the chance it will not measure up, but for fucks sake, at least do the measuring.
alexpotato
For folks interested in how far a publisher will go for a journalist, I recommend reading the story about Michael Pollan when he wanted to publish an article about opium. Summary: - first publisher said: you can't publish this b/c you could go to prison and we could get in trouble financially - second publisher: you are going to publish this. If you go to prison, we will support your family financially for the entire time you are in prison. If you lose your house, we will buy them a new house. You can read about it here: https://tim.blog/2021/06/30/michael-pollan-this-is-your-mind... People talk a LOT about defending free speech but this story has always stuck out to me as what that really means.