A Crime Doesn't Make a Child an Adult
paulpauper
19 points
32 comments
June 11, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 102.6ms across 10,094 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Do Not Turn Child Protection into Internet Access Control smartmic · 595 pts · March 21, 2026 · 47% similar
- Adults Lose Skills to AI. Children Never Build Them ndr42 · 90 pts · March 28, 2026 · 47% similar
- Boredom Is the Price We Pay for Meaning myth_drannon · 12 pts · March 10, 2026 · 45% similar
- Angry parents: 'Phones should be illegal for kids until they're 18 ' 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 14 pts · March 31, 2026 · 45% similar
- The quiet disappearance of the free-range childhood sylvainkalache · 208 pts · April 18, 2026 · 44% similar
Discussion Highlights (7 comments)
newsicanuse
Writers like the author should go through the trauma of being a victim of juvenile crimes, only then will they stop writing such rubbish.
casey2
A minor is a legal fiction it can and will be discarded when convenient. Many people either don't understand or pretend not to understand that order is the only thing preventing so called children from killing and eating you.
ipsento606
After finishing the article, I am left with a much deeper suspicion of the felony murder rule, and of plea deals in general, than I am of giving minors the same sentences as adults. That's not to say that I agree with giving minors adult sentences. But it doesn't seem the worst thing about the cases discussed here.
dani__german
These young offenders are not blank slates whose future actions depend entirely upon how the state treats them. Rhetoric like the Author's has lead to disastrous soft on crime policies that have a death toll associated. Every year that a criminal is incarcerated is a year that they CANNOT kill an innocent citizen, rob a home or store, desecrate or vandalize the community, shoot up fentanyl in the streets, or do any number of things. Every year we refuse to incarcerate criminals, is another year that regular citizens are forced to live in prison like conditions. Just like we see people "tribing up" by race in prison, forcing the youth to live in an open air prison is one of the direct causes of the rise in racism in today's youth.
rayiner
I wish people would stop using the word “child” in an effort to minimize criminal behavior by young adults. A 16 or 17 year old isn’t a “child.” The Marquis de Lafayette and James Manor were just 18 when the revolutionary war started. Societies going back to ancient times ascribed significant responsibility to teenagers. And in modern times, there is a scientific basis for distinguishing between adolescents and children when it comes to brain development. Historically, adolescents were treated like adults. The article’s focus on moral culpability also overlooks the key purpose of the justice system: protecting society from criminals. In that respect, the age actually creates a bigger risk. People who start engaging in criminal conduct at an earlier age more likely to engage in criminal behavior as adults: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/youth-justice-involvemen... (“Continuity of offending from the juvenile into the adult years is higher for people who start offending at an early age, chronic delinquents, and young people who commit violent offenses.”). If you look at the curve of when violent conduct occurs, it peaks from ages 13-25. And it’s actually about as high at age 13 as it is at age 25, with the peak around 18-19. A more rational and less emotional sentencing system would be harsher on teenage offenders while reducing sentences overall. If someone is committing violent crimes at age 15, that signals an increased risk of violent criminality for the next decade. Short sentences will mean that person will keep victimizing society repeatedly over that period. On the other hand, multi-decade sentences are counter productive. Violent criminality drops sharply after age 40.
chucksmash
The article is so facile. > Yet crime-data analysts have noted that Louisiana’s crime wave was in keeping with a national trend This is meant to be mitigating? What is this thought process? Who in their right mind is like "okay, a group of people broke into your home at night but your state shouldn't have been so hard on them for what ensued because akshually it was part of a whole nationwide trend at the time." The modern right absolutely thrives on the fact that so many mostly reasonable people can't see that "play stupid games win stupid prizes" is just another side of the "tolerate anything but intolerance" coin. You can be in favor of showing leniency to kids for dumb, youthful mistakes without taking the doe-eyed approach that every dumb thing someone does in their youth is nothing more than a mistake. And the fact that you yourself made some poor decisions as a youth doesn't mean you have to look at a group burglarizing a house as "well, kids will be kids."
warumdarum
What about cultures that see children as throw away tools and cannonfood for crime? Like sending thrm forth to throw stones, chant racist slogans on demos, etc?