A blueprint for formal verification of Apple corecrypto
hasheddan
85 points
4 comments
May 22, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 697.7ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Apple Core AI Framework hmokiguess · 248 pts · June 08, 2026 · 51% similar
- Apple Exclaves and the Secure Design of the Neo's On-Screen Camera Indicator JumpCrisscross · 30 pts · March 16, 2026 · 49% similar
- CVE-2026-28952: Apple macOS 26.5 Kernel Vuln found by Claude dragonsenseiguy · 118 pts · May 25, 2026 · 48% similar
- Apple's Security Has Been Tough to Crack. Mythos Helped Find a Way In jbredeche · 13 pts · May 14, 2026 · 47% similar
- Don't Trust, Verify lwhsiao · 17 pts · March 28, 2026 · 44% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
H0-LawJik
The missing-step bug in early ML-DSA is the perfect case for SAW. rare inputs that pass code review because the line that should be there doesn't look absent, it looks like the next line is correct. tests wouldn't catch it unless someone happened to roll exactly the right inputs.
AlotOfReading
SAW/Cryptol are amazingly easy to use compared to other formal methods tools. It's a shame that C++ is still popular in high assurance spaces, because the tooling for it and the ability to write safe code is so much worse than C these days.
throwaway85825
Verified crypto is important but apple still doesnt take parser security seriously enough. They know it's insecure and offer lockdown mode instead of fixing it.
FabHK
Had totally forgotten that Apple had rolled out post-quantum crypto (ML-KEM and ML-DSA, FIPS 203 and FIPS 204, respectively) already back in 2024. [1] Slightly off topic, but it's great to see "crypto" to mean cryptography, helping users to keep their data secure, and not as so often these days those silly cryptocurrency crime tokens. [1] https://security.apple.com/blog/imessage-pq3/