1.4 GW: battery storage at former Grohnde nuclear power plant
pantalaimon
54 points
59 comments
April 30, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 87.2ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Switzerland builds most powerful redox-flow battery simonpure · 15 pts · April 07, 2026 · 50% similar
- Solar and batteries can power the world edent · 266 pts · April 03, 2026 · 48% similar
- Germany's Solar Boom Eases Power Costs as Gas Price Jumps toomuchtodo · 82 pts · March 10, 2026 · 47% similar
- Firm solar and storage costs fall to $54/MWh, says IRENA epistasis · 29 pts · May 06, 2026 · 47% similar
- Germany Power Prices Turn Deeply Negative on Renewables Surge rustoo · 78 pts · April 07, 2026 · 46% similar
Discussion Highlights (7 comments)
HelloUsername
not great, not terrible
skywhopper
Recently had a battery storage facility nixed near where I live because the loudest local residents were panicked about possibilities of leaks of heavy chemicals into the groundwater (which is somewhat fair) and a bunch of less reasonable nonsense. Still, assuming the legit risks can be handled, facilities like these are crucial to future growth in electricity demand.
wongarsu
Batteries are deployed quickly, but high-capacity grid connections can take a decade in the planning phase alone. Everyone wants one, and NIMBYs are quick to oppose them. Locating at a decommissioned nuclear plant is a great solution avoiding this issue
nickcw
1.4 GW power, 6 GWh capacity 6 GWh is approximately 5 kilotons of TNT equivalent. Would make a big bang should it go off.
boringg
Wow this is a massive arbitrage play. Big proponent of BESS but 5 GW of batteries to buy cheap wind and sell at a higher price is a wild bet. Must have a lot of grants and government money for this one to pencil out.
trklausss
Nice to see it’s being put to good use. I used to fly the rodeo thermals with a glider… Missing the cloud machine :’)
elzbardico
So it can store 6 hours of output of the previous existing nuclear power station.