11 Nanoseconds per Word: Over-Optimizing Anagrams

ColinWright 15 points 2 comments November 04, 2026
wiredream.com · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (2 comments)

oguz-ismail2

If the dictionary is static what's the point of building a hashtable out of it at runtime? If it's not how do we know this'll work with a different dictionary? I didn't know about Gödel numbering though, that part is cool.

wood_spirit

This reminds me fondly of things I used to do for programming contests :) I think I did an anagram dictionary once. My memory is that I computed the anagrams once ever and made a dictionary file which was a sorted word list and the offset of the next anagram of that word. The sorted letters for each anagram group were also in the same list. Because it was searching for multiple word phrases you just did a search on the subsets of letters left for candidates. Scrabble dictionaries were the most mind bending I think. I don’t think I wrote anagrams up but this is the scrabble one https://williame.github.io/post/87682811573.html

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
11,645 stories · 110,129 chunks indexed