$10K Bounty to Anyone Who Can Hack Ring Cameras to Stop Sharing Data with Amazon
speckx
12 points
5 comments
March 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 49.4ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Microsoft weighs legal action over $50B Amazon-OpenAI cloud deal merksittich · 12 pts · March 18, 2026 · 44% similar
- Hundreds of Millions of iPhones Can Be Hacked With a New Tool Found in the Wild WalterSobchak · 115 pts · March 18, 2026 · 43% similar
- America tells private firms to “hack back” andsoitis · 127 pts · March 23, 2026 · 43% similar
- Remove your ring camera with a claw hammer gpvos · 78 pts · March 18, 2026 · 43% similar
- Node.js Security Bug Bounty Program Paused 0xedb · 14 pts · April 02, 2026 · 42% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
jazz9k
I wonder how it's actually sent. Could you use them on a segregated network and block all DNS requests to the Amazon servers? This is also too low. Ring pays criticals $12-30K
jqpabc123
Doing this without any loss of functionality would likely require replacing Amazon's backend servers. Which is unlikely but even if done, you would still be sharing data with someone else. The most reasonable alternative is to replace the hardware. I use Amcrest which supports RTSP. But then you'll need software to monitor and record. I use Blue Iris. But then you'll probably want a way to access your PC remotely to check on things. I use MS RDP but it needs custom setup for reasonable security (custom port, timeout for too many invalid logins, port forwarding on your router, etc.). All things considered, this ain't happening for most users and I'm pretty sure Amazon knows it.
michael_pica
Would be interesting to find a way to emulate the Amazon back end to either a local server or at least a private cloud account. I think with more and more appliances and other hardware being useless when not attached to a paid service we'll see consumer interest in making it work without the service. Not sure that consumer interest will ever translate into action unless the "offline" hack ends up being easier to implement than the original service plan, consumers tend to be more driven by convenience over cost. But I think there are a small sub-set of us who just want to actually own what we own.